evidoria

What works in Poland

All catalogues

68
evaluated practices
62/100
average quality score
2%
strong evidence, of 60 assessed
2
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Poland

Poland has developed multiple initiatives to advance women's leadership and participation across sectors. These include Polish Businesswomen Opportunities, which supports women in leadership and entrepreneurship through congresses addressing work-life balance and strategic partnerships; IKAR - Women's Active Development Incubator, a regional program in Podlasie focused on civic engagement and political involvement; Empowering women in forestry, which strengthens women's roles in the traditionally male-dominated forestry sector through networking and conferences; and Women in AI Poland, a professional network for women in artificial intelligence based in Katowice. However, the practices provide only descriptive/self-reported evidence without quantified outcomes or impact measurements.

Drawn from: Women in Tech Days · Polish Businesswomen Opportunities · IKAR - Women's Active Development Incubator · Empowering women in forestry · Women in AI Poland (WAI - Women in AI) · Women in the Development of Artificial Intelligence · More power to women in sports · Equal chances for woman at the labour market – the theoretical and empirical aspects

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Efficiency +39 pts 83 here · 44 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +19 pts 67 here · 48 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Effectiveness +15 pts 92 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality +13 pts 93 here · 80 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +13 pts 50 here · 37 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Scalability +8 pts 72 here · 64 average

Weaknesses

Equity & inclusion -11 pts 42 here · 52 average

Evidence of learning impact -11 pts 17 here · 28 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -12 pts 19 here · 31 average

Documented learning -13 pts 62 here · 74 average

Curator validation -16 pts 59 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach -22 pts 54 here · 76 average

Evaluation evidence -37 pts 8 here · 45 average

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
83 · 44
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 48
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 50
Effectiveness
92 · 77
Impact on gender equality
93 · 80
Teacher capability & pedagogy
50 · 37
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Scalability
72 · 64
Governance, capability & sustainability
71 · 64
Transparency, fairness & accountability
59 · 54
Evidence of impact / measured results
63 · 59
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
80 · 76
Transferability / replicability
63 · 59
Evaluated outcomes
86 · 84
Sustainability
79 · 78
Innovation level
60 · 63
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
48 · 51
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Inclusiveness / equity
35 · 42
Equity & inclusion
42 · 52
Evidence of learning impact
17 · 28
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
19 · 31
Documented learning
62 · 74
Curator validation
59 · 74
Demonstrated reach
54 · 76
Evaluation evidence
8 · 45

Coloured bar: Poland. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Women in Tech Days · 97

Polish Businesswomen Opportunities · 96

IKAR - Women's Active Development Incubator · 93

Empowering women in forestry · 93

Women in AI Poland (WAI - Women in AI) · 89

Women in the Development of Artificial Intelligence · 89

More power to women in sports · 89

Green Million — Wieliczka's Proportional-Algorithm Participatory Budget (Method of Equal Shares) · 87

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Poland concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Pikin Tab — Imagine Worldwide's Solar-Powered Tablet Learning Programme in Sierra Leone · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Empowering Global Leadership: The Role of International Women's Forum Finland in Advancing Women's Leadership and Gender Equality · fit 84/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Matches your scale
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more