evidoria

What works in Warsaw

All catalogues · Poland profile

19
evaluated practices
63/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 19 assessed
{# KAN-370: every section closes with a one-line "what is this number" note + Know more. The note only names metrics actually shown — the strong-evidence tile hides when nothing is assessed (KAN-364 honesty rule), so its mention hides with it. #}

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Warsaw

Warsaw's innovation and startup ecosystem is supported by dedicated municipal and private institutions. Warsaw Booster, the city's annual accelerator programme, has supported over 460 companies across 12 editions since 2015, with three Demo Day winners per cohort receiving non-dilutive prizes of PLN 50,000, 30,000, and 20,000, backed by over 100 mentors and corporate partners. CIC Warsaw at Varso Place operates as Central-Eastern Europe's leading innovation campus, hosting 175+ member companies with approximately 1,000 people onsite daily, and its embedded Venture Café Warsaw delivered 50+ Thursday Gatherings with 14,500+ participants in 2024. Beyond startups, Polish Businesswomen Opportunities initiatives, including the Business Woman Congress, address work-life balance and support women in leadership and entrepreneurship across sectors including tech, finance, and innovation.

Drawn from: Polish Businesswomen Opportunities · CIC Warsaw at Varso Place — Central-Eastern Europe's Leading Innovation Campus · Warsaw Booster — Municipal Startup Accelerator · Food Inflation Nowcasting with Web-Scraped Prices — Narodowy Bank Polski's Big-Data Model for Real-Time CPI Estimates · Poland Digital Uczeń — National AI labs and teacher AI literacy programme · Coders Lab · Toolkit to Teach Library Users How to Use Skype · Link to the Future. Youth. Internet. Career.

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

{# KAN-369 chips show whole points; the explanation lives in the section's bottom note (KAN-370) so each concept is explained exactly once. #}

Strengths

Transparency, ethics & data protection +33 pts 83 here · 50 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +27 pts 67 here · 39 average

Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average

Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +16 pts 67 here · 51 average

Scalability +16 pts 82 here · 66 average

Equity & inclusion +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Inclusiveness / equity +12 pts 53 here · 41 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Weaknesses

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced -9 pts 0 here · 9 average

Curator validation -22 pts 53 here · 75 average

Evaluated outcomes -34 pts 50 here · 84 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -35 pts 0 here · 35 average

Evaluation evidence -36 pts 0 here · 36 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -53 pts 0 here · 53 average

{# Score profile vs peers (KAN-364, UX2.3): every dimension as place-vs-corpus bars — the full picture behind the strengths/weaknesses shortlists above. #}

Score profile vs peers

Transparency, ethics & data protection
83 · 50
Teacher capability & pedagogy
67 · 39
Documented learning
100 · 73
Effectiveness
100 · 81
Impact on gender equality
100 · 83
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 51
Scalability
82 · 66
Equity & inclusion
67 · 54
Inclusiveness / equity
53 · 41
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 30
Transferability / replicability
61 · 59
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
80 · 78
Demonstrated reach
75 · 75
Evidence of impact / measured results
59 · 60
Efficiency
50 · 52
Transparency, fairness & accountability
50 · 54
Sustainability
76 · 80
Innovation level
60 · 64
Governance, capability & sustainability
60 · 66
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 9
Curator validation
53 · 75
Evaluated outcomes
50 · 84
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 35
Evaluation evidence
0 · 36
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
0 · 53

Coloured bar: Warsaw. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Polish Businesswomen Opportunities · 96

CIC Warsaw at Varso Place — Central-Eastern Europe's Leading Innovation Campus · 81

Warsaw Booster — Municipal Startup Accelerator · 81

Food Inflation Nowcasting with Web-Scraped Prices — Narodowy Bank Polski's Big-Data Model for Real-Time CPI Estimates · 80

Poland Digital Uczeń — National AI labs and teacher AI literacy programme · 73

Coders Lab · 72

Toolkit to Teach Library Users How to Use Skype · 72

Link to the Future. Youth. Internet. Career. · 72

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Liga Inan – Mobile Maternal Health Messaging Network · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Empowering Global Leadership: The Role of International Women's Forum Finland in Advancing Women's Leadership and Gender Equality · fit 84/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Matches your scale
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more