evidoria

What works in Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha

All catalogues

4
evaluated practices
39/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 3 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha

The CONTEXT practices address Saint Helena and Ascension Island specifically, but not Tristan da Cunha as a territory in its own right.

Saint Helena's broadband infrastructure transitioned from satellite-only connectivity to Google's Equiano subsea cable in October 2023, cutting latency to London from 657 milliseconds to 131 milliseconds, though uptake remains limited with only ~10% of purchased capacity in use due to ageing copper last-mile networks and high retail pricing (~£120/month). Ascension Island underwent a three-phase feral cat eradication programme (2002–2006) funded at approximately £650,000, which enabled seabird recolonization—Ascension frigatebird nesting attempts grew from 2 pairs in 2012 to 1,493 in 2020–21. The practices contain no substantive evidence about Tristan da Cunha as a distinct jurisdiction.

Drawn from: Saint Helena's Broadband Story — International Cable Success, Failed Domestic Fibre, and a 2026 Restart · St Helena's Equiano Landing — Subsea Fibre for One of the World's Most Remote Territories · Ascension Island Feral Cat Eradication and Seabird Recolonization · Gough Island Restoration Programme — RSPB-Led Rodent Eradication for Critically Endangered Seabirds

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +36 pts 83 here · 48 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Governance, certification & transferability +20 pts 83 here · 64 average

Weaknesses

Innovation -8 pts 53 here · 62 average

Evidence of impact / measured results -24 pts 33 here · 57 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -27 pts 0 here · 27 average

Scalability -29 pts 33 here · 62 average

Inclusiveness / equity -43 pts 0 here · 43 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -48 pts 0 here · 48 average

Sustainability / continuity -61 pts 17 here · 78 average

Demonstrated reach -76 pts 0 here · 76 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
83 · 48
Documented learning
100 · 74
Governance, certification & transferability
83 · 64
Transferability / demonstrated replication
67 · 60
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 74
Innovation
53 · 62
Evidence of impact / measured results
33 · 57
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 27
Scalability
33 · 62
Inclusiveness / equity
0 · 43
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
0 · 48
Sustainability / continuity
17 · 78
Demonstrated reach
0 · 76

Coloured bar: Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Saint Helena's Broadband Story — International Cable Success, Failed Domestic Fibre, and a 2026 Restart · 48

St Helena's Equiano Landing — Subsea Fibre for One of the World's Most Remote Territories · 43

Ascension Island Feral Cat Eradication and Seabird Recolonization · 40

Gough Island Restoration Programme — RSPB-Led Rodent Eradication for Critically Endangered Seabirds · 27

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more