What works in Georgetown
All catalogues · Guyana profile· Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha profile
This profile covers practices recorded under this city name in 2 countries — check each practice's own page for its exact location.
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
{# KAN-369 chips show whole points; the explanation lives in the section's bottom note (KAN-370) so each concept is explained exactly once. #}Strengths
Efficiency +48 pts 100 here · 52 average
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +30 pts 83 here · 53 average
Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average
Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average
Curator validation +25 pts 100 here · 75 average
Sustainability +20 pts 100 here · 80 average
Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average
Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average
Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +15 pts 50 here · 35 average
Equity & inclusion +13 pts 67 here · 54 average
Governance, certification & transferability +12 pts 78 here · 66 average
Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average
Weaknesses
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced -9 pts 0 here · 9 average
Transferability / replicability -9 pts 50 here · 59 average
Scalability & sustainability -10 pts 56 here · 66 average
Transparency, ethics & data protection -17 pts 33 here · 50 average
Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average
Innovation level -24 pts 40 here · 64 average
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -34 pts 17 here · 51 average
Evaluation evidence -36 pts 0 here · 36 average
Evidence of impact / measured public value -60 pts 0 here · 60 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Georgetown. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · 100
GOAL: Guyana's National Online Scholarship Programme — Scale, Reach and a Quality-Control Lesson · 68
Guyana Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS) 2030 · 60
Guyana Digital School — National AI-Powered Online Learning Platform · 47
STEMGuyana's AI Tutor and Pathway Online Academy — Personalised Learning Across Guyana's Ten Regions · 47
Ascension Island Feral Cat Eradication and Seabird Recolonization · 40
AskGov — Guyana's Generative-AI Assistant for Government Services · 20
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more