evidoria

What works in Türkiye

All catalogues

22
evaluated practices
55/100
average quality score
16%
strong evidence, of 19 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Türkiye

Drawn from: BTK Akademi – National Free Online ICT Skills Platform (Türkiye) · SKAI — WFP and Google Research's Open-Source AI for Rapid Earthquake Damage Mapping in Türkiye · MEVA — Turkey's Spatial Data System Catching Undeclared Property Income · AFAD's AI-Powered Building-Damage Assessment — Microsoft's AI for Good Lab Mapped 2023 Earthquake Destruction from Satellite Imagery · ODTÜ Teknokent (METU Technopark): Turkey's First University-to-Market Technology Zone · ITU ARI Teknokent — Istanbul Technical University Science Park · METU Technopolis — Ankara's pioneering university technology development zone · ChatGPT-Assisted IEP Goal-Writing — Two Randomised Trials for Special-Education Teachers in Samsun, Turkey

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Evidence of learning impact +22 pts 50 here · 28 average

Evaluation evidence +22 pts 67 here · 45 average

Evaluated outcomes +15 pts 100 here · 85 average

Sustainability (ongoing) +14 pts 93 here · 78 average

Transferability / demonstrated replication +10 pts 70 here · 60 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Inclusiveness / equity -9 pts 33 here · 42 average

Demonstrated reach -9 pts 67 here · 76 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 48 average

Governance, capability & sustainability -22 pts 43 here · 64 average

Documented learning -41 pts 33 here · 74 average

Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -51 pts 0 here · 51 average

Effectiveness -77 pts 0 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality -80 pts 0 here · 80 average

Achievement / evidence -91 pts 0 here · 91 average

Score profile vs peers

Curator validation
100 · 74
Evidence of learning impact
50 · 28
Evaluation evidence
67 · 45
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 85
Sustainability (ongoing)
93 · 78
Transferability / demonstrated replication
70 · 60
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Teacher capability & pedagogy
44 · 37
Evidence of impact / measured public value
63 · 59
Equity & inclusion
56 · 52
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 31
Scalability & sustainability
65 · 64
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
50 · 50
Transparency, fairness & accountability
53 · 54
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
73 · 76
Innovation level
60 · 63
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 42
Demonstrated reach
67 · 76
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 48
Governance, capability & sustainability
43 · 64
Documented learning
33 · 74
Efficiency
0 · 44
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
0 · 51
Effectiveness
0 · 77
Impact on gender equality
0 · 80
Achievement / evidence
0 · 91

Coloured bar: Türkiye. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

BTK Akademi – National Free Online ICT Skills Platform (Türkiye) · 92

SKAI — WFP and Google Research's Open-Source AI for Rapid Earthquake Damage Mapping in Türkiye · 87

Marmara Municipalities Union — Local Government Academy & Mentor Programme · 76

MEVA — Turkey's Spatial Data System Catching Undeclared Property Income · 73

AFAD's AI-Powered Building-Damage Assessment — Microsoft's AI for Good Lab Mapped 2023 Earthquake Destruction from Satellite Imagery · 73

ODTÜ Teknokent (METU Technopark): Turkey's First University-to-Market Technology Zone · 67

ITU ARI Teknokent — Istanbul Technical University Science Park · 67

METU Technopolis — Ankara's pioneering university technology development zone · 62

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Türkiye concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more