evidoria

What works in Ankara

All catalogues · Türkiye profile

13
evaluated practices
53/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 11 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Ankara

Ankara hosts multiple technology and innovation hubs that anchor Turkey's broader digital ecosystem. METU Technopolis operates as one of Turkey's earliest university technology development zones, hosting 200+ resident technology companies and thousands of R&D personnel, and its model has shaped 90+ national technology development zones. ODTÜ Teknokent, Turkey's first legally designated technology development zone (established 2001), reports 450+ tenant firms employing over 10,000 people with $1.3 billion in cumulative technology exports and notable exits including OpsGenie's $295 million acquisition by Atlassian. The city is also home to Otsimo, an AI-driven special-education app founded in 2016 that has reached 150,000+ users.

Drawn from: BTK Akademi – National Free Online ICT Skills Platform (Türkiye) · MEVA — Turkey's Spatial Data System Catching Undeclared Property Income · ODTÜ Teknokent (METU Technopark): Turkey's First University-to-Market Technology Zone · METU Technopolis — Ankara's pioneering university technology development zone · Otsimo — AI-Personalised Special-Education Games for Autistic and Down-Syndrome Learners in Turkey · TÜBİTAK 1513 — Turkey's Technology Transfer Office Support Program · Turkey's Law No. 6284 and the ALO 183 Hotline — Rising Protection Orders, Persistent Enforcement Gaps · TİHEK's Discrimination-Based Digital Accessibility Enforcement — Turkey's Complaint-Driven Route to Inclusive Design

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Equity & inclusion +33 pts 83 here · 50 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +19 pts 67 here · 48 average

Sustainability (ongoing) +12 pts 90 here · 78 average

Scalability & sustainability +9 pts 71 here · 62 average

Weaknesses

Innovation level -9 pts 53 here · 62 average

Evidence of learning impact -10 pts 17 here · 26 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average

Inclusiveness / equity -20 pts 22 here · 43 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -21 pts 17 here · 37 average

Governance, capability & sustainability -22 pts 42 here · 64 average

Documented learning -24 pts 50 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach -26 pts 50 here · 76 average

Evaluated outcomes -29 pts 50 here · 79 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -31 pts 22 here · 54 average

Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average

Achievement / evidence -38 pts 50 here · 88 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -39 pts 50 here · 89 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -48 pts 0 here · 48 average

Effectiveness -68 pts 0 here · 68 average

Impact on gender equality -71 pts 0 here · 71 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Equity & inclusion
83 · 50
Curator validation
100 · 73
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 48
Sustainability (ongoing)
90 · 78
Scalability & sustainability
71 · 62
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 28
Evidence of impact / measured public value
61 · 57
Transferability / demonstrated replication
62 · 60
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 74
Innovation level
53 · 62
Evidence of learning impact
17 · 26
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 47
Inclusiveness / equity
22 · 43
Teacher capability & pedagogy
17 · 37
Governance, capability & sustainability
42 · 64
Documented learning
50 · 74
Demonstrated reach
50 · 76
Evaluated outcomes
50 · 79
Transparency, fairness & accountability
22 · 54
Efficiency
0 · 33
Achievement / evidence
50 · 88
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
50 · 89
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
0 · 48
Effectiveness
0 · 68
Impact on gender equality
0 · 71

Coloured bar: Ankara. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

BTK Akademi – National Free Online ICT Skills Platform (Türkiye) · 92

MEVA — Turkey's Spatial Data System Catching Undeclared Property Income · 73

ODTÜ Teknokent (METU Technopark): Turkey's First University-to-Market Technology Zone · 67

METU Technopolis — Ankara's pioneering university technology development zone · 62

Otsimo — AI-Personalised Special-Education Games for Autistic and Down-Syndrome Learners in Turkey · 53

TÜBİTAK 1513 — Turkey's Technology Transfer Office Support Program · 52

Turkey's Law No. 6284 and the ALO 183 Hotline — Rising Protection Orders, Persistent Enforcement Gaps · 48

TİHEK's Discrimination-Based Digital Accessibility Enforcement — Turkey's Complaint-Driven Route to Inclusive Design · 48

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more