evidoria

What works in Uruguay

All catalogues

25
evaluated practices
64/100
average quality score
11%
strong evidence, of 19 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Uruguay

Uruguay has implemented several large-scale digital-inclusion programmes: Plan Ceibal has reached 670,312 direct beneficiaries and connected 99% of public schools since 2007, while Plan Ibirapitá distributed nearly 193,000 tablets to low-income pensioners by 2019, though only 70% reported use and 57% had not used their device in the week before survey. Uruguay's National Integrated Care System formalised care work as a regulated profession, with women comprising 94.9% of registered paid care workers. Uruguay's accessibility observatory audits state websites against WCAG 2.1 every six months, finding that 48% of institutional portals reduced errors by October 2025, though only 31% of 16 disability-oriented transactions conformed.

Drawn from: Observatorio de Accesibilidad Digital — Uruguay's Six-Monthly Open-Data Accessibility Measurement · Plan Ibirapitá – Free Tablets and Digital Literacy for Low-Income Pensioners · Plan Ceibal – National Digital Inclusion in Public Education · Uruguay's National Integrated Care System (Sistema Nacional Integrado de Cuidados) · Plan Ceibal — Uruguay's national adaptive mathematics platform for primary education · Ley N.º 18.561 — Uruguay's Pioneering Workplace Sexual Harassment Law · Uruguay's Comprehensive Law on Gender-Based Violence (Ley N° 19.580, 2017) · ANII's Innovative Entrepreneurship Support Programme

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +30 pts 75 here · 45 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Evidence of learning impact +22 pts 50 here · 28 average

Sustainability (ongoing) +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Equity & inclusion +20 pts 72 here · 52 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +19 pts 67 here · 48 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +16 pts 67 here · 50 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Efficiency -11 pts 33 here · 44 average

Inclusiveness / equity -15 pts 27 here · 42 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -24 pts 67 here · 91 average

Effectiveness -44 pts 33 here · 77 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
75 · 45
Documented learning
100 · 74
Curator validation
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Evidence of learning impact
50 · 28
Sustainability (ongoing)
100 · 78
Equity & inclusion
72 · 52
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 48
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
67 · 50
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 31
Teacher capability & pedagogy
39 · 37
Innovation level
62 · 63
Transferability / demonstrated replication
57 · 59
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
73 · 76
Scalability beyond pilot
61 · 64
Transparency, fairness & accountability
50 · 54
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Evidence of impact / measured public value
52 · 59
Governance, capability & sustainability
57 · 64
Efficiency
33 · 44
Inclusiveness / equity
27 · 42
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 50
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
67 · 91
Effectiveness
33 · 77

Coloured bar: Uruguay. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Observatorio de Accesibilidad Digital — Uruguay's Six-Monthly Open-Data Accessibility Measurement · 92

Plan Ibirapitá – Free Tablets and Digital Literacy for Low-Income Pensioners · 92

Plan Ceibal – National Digital Inclusion in Public Education · 92

Uruguay's National Integrated Care System (Sistema Nacional Integrado de Cuidados) · 85

Plan Ceibal — Uruguay's national adaptive mathematics platform for primary education · 80

Ley N.º 18.561 — Uruguay's Pioneering Workplace Sexual Harassment Law · 74

Uruguay's Comprehensive Law on Gender-Based Violence (Ley N° 19.580, 2017) · 74

ANII's Innovative Entrepreneurship Support Programme · 71

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Uruguay concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Bogotá's Care Blocks (Manzanas del Cuidado) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more