evidoria

What works in Uruguay

All catalogues

34
evaluated practices
60/100
average quality score
7%
strong evidence, of 28 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Uruguay

Uruguay has pursued systematic digital inclusion and accessibility across multiple domains: Plan Ceibal has reached 670,312 public-school students with devices and free internet since 2007, while Plan Ibirapitá distributed nearly 193,000 tablets to low-income pensioners, though only 70% reported regular use and 57% had not used their device in the week before survey. The Observatorio de Accesibilidad Digital measures accessibility compliance across 130 public organisations every six months, finding that 48% of institutional portals reduced accessibility errors between April and October 2025, though only 31% of disability-oriented transactions met guidelines. Additionally, Uruguay established early labour protections for domestic workers through its 2006 law and became the first country to ratify ILO Convention 189 in 2012, formalising the sector with a 67% increase in registered domestic workers between 2004 and 2012.

Drawn from: Observatorio de Accesibilidad Digital — Uruguay's Six-Monthly Open-Data Accessibility Measurement · Plan Ibirapitá – Free Tablets and Digital Literacy for Low-Income Pensioners · Plan Ceibal – National Digital Inclusion in Public Education · Uruguay's Domestic Workers Law and First Ratification of ILO Convention 189 · Uruguay's National Integrated Care System (Sistema Nacional Integrado de Cuidados) · Plan Ceibal — Uruguay's national adaptive mathematics platform for primary education · Ley N.º 18.561 — Uruguay's Pioneering Workplace Sexual Harassment Law · Uruguay's Comprehensive Law on Gender-Based Violence (Ley N° 19.580, 2017)

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +26 pts 75 here · 49 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Evidence of learning impact +24 pts 50 here · 26 average

Sustainability (ongoing) +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Equity & inclusion +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +16 pts 62 here · 47 average

Impact on gender equality +14 pts 83 here · 70 average

Curator validation +10 pts 83 here · 73 average

Weaknesses

Evidence of impact / measured public value -14 pts 44 here · 57 average

Efficiency -15 pts 17 here · 32 average

Inclusiveness / equity -16 pts 27 here · 43 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -26 pts 22 here · 48 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -26 pts 22 here · 48 average

Effectiveness -33 pts 33 here · 66 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
75 · 49
Documented learning
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Evidence of learning impact
50 · 26
Sustainability (ongoing)
100 · 78
Equity & inclusion
67 · 50
Transparency, ethics & data protection
62 · 47
Impact on gender equality
83 · 70
Curator validation
83 · 73
Teacher capability & pedagogy
46 · 38
Evaluated outcomes
83 · 78
Transparency, fairness & accountability
54 · 54
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
73 · 74
Innovation level
62 · 62
Scalability beyond pilot
60 · 62
Achievement / evidence
83 · 87
Transferability / demonstrated replication
56 · 60
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
22 · 27
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
83 · 89
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Governance, capability & sustainability
58 · 64
Evidence of impact / measured public value
44 · 57
Efficiency
17 · 32
Inclusiveness / equity
27 · 43
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
22 · 48
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
22 · 48
Effectiveness
33 · 66

Coloured bar: Uruguay. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Observatorio de Accesibilidad Digital — Uruguay's Six-Monthly Open-Data Accessibility Measurement · 92

Plan Ibirapitá – Free Tablets and Digital Literacy for Low-Income Pensioners · 92

Plan Ceibal – National Digital Inclusion in Public Education · 92

Uruguay's Domestic Workers Law and First Ratification of ILO Convention 189 · 85

Uruguay's National Integrated Care System (Sistema Nacional Integrado de Cuidados) · 85

Plan Ceibal — Uruguay's national adaptive mathematics platform for primary education · 80

Ley N.º 18.561 — Uruguay's Pioneering Workplace Sexual Harassment Law · 74

Uruguay's Comprehensive Law on Gender-Based Violence (Ley N° 19.580, 2017) · 74

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Uruguay concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Bogotá's Care Blocks (Manzanas del Cuidado) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more