evidoria

What works in Zambia

All catalogues

21
evaluated practices
56/100
average quality score
12%
strong evidence, of 17 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Zambia

Drawn from: Ask Viamo Anything — Voice-First Generative AI for Feature-Phone Users in Zambia · Zambia GEWEL — Girls' Education, Women's Empowerment and Livelihoods Programme · AVE — AI-Assisted Cervical Precancer Screening in Zambia's Public Health Facilities · BongoHive — Zambia's First Technology & Innovation Hub · IGC and ZamStats Use GPT Models to Speed Up Zambia's Labour Force Survey Coding · Rural ICT Hubs for Women and Girls (GRZ-UN Joint Programme on GBV) · Lusaka Sanitation Project — World Bank-Financed Sewer Upgrading for Zambia's Capital · Mulungushi University's IIOE Centre — Zambia's Generative AI Teacher Training and National AI-in-Education Policy Drive

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Efficiency +56 pts 100 here · 44 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Inclusiveness / equity +25 pts 67 here · 42 average

Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average

Evaluation evidence +22 pts 67 here · 45 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Evaluated outcomes +15 pts 100 here · 85 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +14 pts 44 here · 31 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value +12 pts 71 here · 59 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Demonstrated reach -9 pts 67 here · 76 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -12 pts 39 here · 51 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -28 pts 22 here · 50 average

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
100 · 44
Documented learning
100 · 74
Curator validation
100 · 74
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 42
Effectiveness
100 · 77
Evaluation evidence
67 · 45
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 85
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
44 · 31
Evidence of impact / measured public value
71 · 59
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Transferability / replicability
67 · 60
Transparency, fairness & accountability
60 · 54
Equity & inclusion
56 · 52
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 64
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
78 · 76
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
6 · 7
Transparency, ethics & data protection
44 · 48
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 37
Evidence of learning impact
22 · 28
Scalability beyond pilot
58 · 64
Sustainability
71 · 78
Innovation level
56 · 63
Demonstrated reach
67 · 76
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
39 · 51
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
22 · 50

Coloured bar: Zambia. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Ask Viamo Anything — Voice-First Generative AI for Feature-Phone Users in Zambia · 100

Zambia GEWEL — Girls' Education, Women's Empowerment and Livelihoods Programme · 96

AVE — AI-Assisted Cervical Precancer Screening in Zambia's Public Health Facilities · 80

BongoHive — Zambia's First Technology & Innovation Hub · 76

IGC and ZamStats Use GPT Models to Speed Up Zambia's Labour Force Survey Coding · 73

Rural ICT Hubs for Women and Girls (GRZ-UN Joint Programme on GBV) · 72

Lusaka Sanitation Project — World Bank-Financed Sewer Upgrading for Zambia's Capital · 67

Mulungushi University's IIOE Centre — Zambia's Generative AI Teacher Training and National AI-in-Education Policy Drive · 67

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Zambia concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more