evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice

25% Women's Quota in Local Government Elections

Sri Lanka · Colombo · See the Sri Lanka profile

Sri Lanka's 2016 law required 25% women candidates for local councils. In the 2018 elections, women's representation jumped from under 2% to roughly 23%, though legal loopholes have since let some councils avoid full compliance.

<2 %
Women's share of local council seats, pre-quota
~23 %
Women's share of local council seats, 2018 election (2018)
~2,000
Women elected to local councils (2018)
49 (vs 16 in 2018)
Local authorities with zero women elected (2025)
~11 %
Women's share of local council seats (2025)

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Election Commission of Sri Lanka
Period
2016–present
Keywords
electoral reform, political participation, local governance

Context

A 2016 amendment to Sri Lanka's Local Authorities Elections Ordinance required parties to nominate at least 25% women candidates for local council elections, following decades in which women held under 2% of local council seats, one of the lowest rates in South Asia.

Activities

The quota is split across a mixed ward-candidate list (minimum 10% women) and a proportional additional-members list (minimum 50% women), enforced by the Election Commission of Sri Lanka; it was first applied in the February 2018 local elections.

Results

Women's local-council representation rose from under 2% pre-reform to roughly 23% after the 2018 elections, with nearly 2,000 women elected -- described by UN Women and IFES as one of the largest single-election jumps in women's local representation recorded globally. A 2025 review found compliance had since weakened: 49 local authorities elected no women at all (versus 16 in 2018), and UN Women put the national women's seat share at roughly 11% by 2025, attributed to an exemption clause (Section 65AA) that lets some parties sidestep the quota.

Conclusions

The quota drove a large initial gain in women's representation, but legal loopholes have allowed uneven compliance since, and later data suggest some erosion of the 2018 gains.

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful