evidoria

What works in Sri Lanka

All catalogues

29
evaluated practices
53/100
average quality score
16%
strong evidence, of 25 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Sri Lanka

Drawn from: Sri Lanka's National Assistive Technology Assessment — A 6,100-Person Survey That Already Shaped Policy · SLASSCOM — Sri Lanka's National IT-BPM Chamber Driving Sector-Wide Company Growth · SIYB Business Training for Women Entrepreneurs — Colombo & Kandy's Two-Track Randomised Trial · University Business Linkage (UBL) Cells — Sri Lanka's AHEAD Technology-Transfer Network · 25% Women's Quota in Local Government Elections · Nenasala Telecentre Network · Colombo Wetland Management Strategy — Ramsar Wetland City Flood Buffer · Pubudu — Deep-Learning Screening for Dyslexia, Dysgraphia and Dyscalculia in Sri Lanka

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Evaluation evidence +26 pts 75 here · 49 average

Evaluated outcomes +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +19 pts 67 here · 48 average

Equity & inclusion +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +15 pts 53 here · 38 average

Achievement / evidence +13 pts 100 here · 87 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +9 pts 57 here · 48 average

Weaknesses

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average

Effectiveness -16 pts 50 here · 66 average

Sustainability (ongoing) -16 pts 62 here · 78 average

Impact on gender equality -20 pts 50 here · 70 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -29 pts 25 here · 54 average

Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -39 pts 50 here · 89 average

Score profile vs peers

Curator validation
100 · 73
Evaluation evidence
75 · 49
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 78
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 48
Equity & inclusion
67 · 50
Teacher capability & pedagogy
53 · 38
Achievement / evidence
100 · 87
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
57 · 48
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 26
Evidence of impact / measured public value
61 · 57
Documented learning
75 · 74
Demonstrated reach
75 · 76
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
71 · 74
Governance, certification & transferability
61 · 64
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
24 · 27
Transferability / replicability
56 · 60
Inclusiveness / equity
38 · 43
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Scalability & sustainability
56 · 62
Innovation level
55 · 62
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 47
Effectiveness
50 · 66
Sustainability (ongoing)
62 · 78
Impact on gender equality
50 · 70
Transparency, fairness & accountability
25 · 54
Efficiency
0 · 32
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
50 · 89

Coloured bar: Sri Lanka. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Sri Lanka's National Assistive Technology Assessment — A 6,100-Person Survey That Already Shaped Policy · 92

SLASSCOM — Sri Lanka's National IT-BPM Chamber Driving Sector-Wide Company Growth · 76

SIYB Business Training for Women Entrepreneurs — Colombo & Kandy's Two-Track Randomised Trial · 76

University Business Linkage (UBL) Cells — Sri Lanka's AHEAD Technology-Transfer Network · 76

25% Women's Quota in Local Government Elections · 74

Nenasala Telecentre Network · 72

Colombo Wetland Management Strategy — Ramsar Wetland City Flood Buffer · 67

Pubudu — Deep-Learning Screening for Dyslexia, Dysgraphia and Dyscalculia in Sri Lanka · 67

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Sri Lanka concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more