A blind consultant's discrimination complaint forced a bank to issue his card in a week; a2i's Disability Innovation Lab then audited 5 banks and issued a 2022 inclusive web-design guideline — yet mobile-internet use by disabled Bangladeshis still lags far behind.
5
Banks audited on accessible design
4%
Persons with disabilities using mobile internet (2025)
27%
People without disabilities using mobile internet (2025)
Details
Maturity
Established
Promoter
Aspire to Innovate (a2i) Programme, ICT Division, Government of Bangladesh
digital government, disability inclusion, financial services
Context
Bangladesh's Aspire to Innovate (a2i) Programme, run by the ICT Division under the Prime Minister's Office, set up a Disability Innovation Lab (DIL) with a panel of accessibility auditors who are themselves blind, deaf or physically disabled, to make the country's digital transformation accessible.
Objectives
To translate individual disability-discrimination cases into systemic change in accessible service design across government and the financial sector.
Activities
After blind a2i consultant Vashkar Bhattacharjee was refused a standard credit card and instead offered one in his wife's name, he took the case to Bangladesh's National Human Rights Commission, which held a hearing on 17 January 2022. a2i used the resulting ruling as leverage to audit five major banks (Sonali, Islami, City, Standard Chartered, Eastern) and briefed their executives on accessible service design on 2 March 2022, feeding into the 'Digital Service and Web Designing Guideline for Inclusive Accessibility 2022'.
Results
The bank issued Bhattacharjee's card within a week of the NHRC hearing. Five major banks were audited and briefed on accessible design. A 2025 joint UNDP Bangladesh/a2i study found that only 4% of persons with disabilities use mobile internet, against 27% of people without disabilities.
Conclusions
The link between the DIL's advocacy and the resulting guideline comes from a2i and ESCAP's own project reporting rather than an independent evaluation, and the 2025 usage gap shows guidelines and audits have not yet translated into equal digital access.
Implementation
Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — A low-cost advocacy and guideline-development effort (a rights complaint, bank audits, executive briefings, one national guideline) rather than infrastructure spend.
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years) — Case originated in 2022 (NHRC hearing, bank audits, guideline issuance); the follow-up usage evaluation was conducted in 2025.
Staffing & skills
a2i Disability Innovation Lab — panel of accessibility auditors who are themselves blind, deaf or physically disabled, ICT Division, Government of Bangladesh
Conditions for success
A concrete individual discrimination case (NHRC ruling) used as leverage for sector-wide bank audits, rather than advocacy alone
Disability-led auditors giving the audits first-hand credibility with audited institutions
Common failure modes
No independent audit of banks' follow-through after the 2022 briefings was found
Mobile-internet use by persons with disabilities (4%) still lags far behind the general population (27%) three years after the guideline was issued
Commonly funded by
National / regional programmes
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Do you run this practice?
Claim it —
verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Data sources
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
India's SugamyaWeb lets government departments self-test websites against GIGW accessibility standards; 200+ departments used it to fix 100,000+ issues, even …