evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

ACOPI Group Consulting — A Low-Cost Extension Model for Colombia's Auto-Parts SMEs

Colombia · Bogotá · See the Colombia profile · See the Bogotá profile

Evidence: Randomised controlled trial Top 50% 67/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

A randomised trial of 159 Colombian auto-parts SME suppliers, mostly around Bogotá, tested individual versus group business consulting. Both lifted management scores 8-10 points; the group model, a third of the cost, produced profit gains still detectable 8-10 years later.

159
Firms randomised
53
Firms per treatment arm
8-10 percentage points
Management-practice score increase (both treatment arms vs. control)
~$10,000
Cost per firm, group consulting
~1/3
Cost of group vs. individual consulting
8-10 years
Follow-up period confirming persistence of gains

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
World Bank Group & ACOPI (Asociación Colombiana de las Micro, Pequeñas y Medianas Empresas)
Period
2014-2022 (intervention 2014-2015; outcomes tracked to 8-10 years)
Keywords
automotive parts manufacturing, SME management consulting, agricultural-extension-style advisory

Context

Colombia's auto-parts suppliers -- first- and second-tier firms to the automobile industry -- have long struggled with weak management practices that cap productivity. In 2014, the World Bank partnered with ACOPI, Colombia's national association of micro, small and medium enterprises, to test whether better management could be taught cheaply enough to reach small firms at scale.

Objectives

To test whether individual or group business consulting could raise management practices and profits among small auto-parts suppliers, and to compare the cost-effectiveness of the two delivery models.

Activities

159 eligible firms, more than half in the Cundinamarca region around Bogotá and the rest in Valle (Cali), Antioquia and the Eje Cafetero, were randomly split into three arms of 53 firms each: a control group receiving only an initial management diagnostic, an individual-consulting group given five specialists (logistics, HR, finance, marketing, production) over 4-6 months, and a group-consulting arm putting 5-6 non-competing firms together with a single consultant, modelled on agricultural-extension peer learning.

Results

Both consulting arms raised measured management practices by 8 to 10 percentage points relative to control -- statistically indistinguishable from each other. Group consulting cost about $10,000 per firm, roughly a third of the individual-consulting price tag. A follow-up study revisiting the same firms 8-10 years later found the gains in management practices and profits had persisted.

Conclusions

Group consulting matched individual consulting's effect on management practices at roughly a third of the cost, and the World Bank's ex-ante estimate had the group treatment paying for itself within roughly a year. The evaluators frame the result as proof of a cost-effective delivery model rather than a ready-to-scale national programme, given the modest single-sector, single-country sample.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
World Bank research team, ACOPI programme staff, Sector-specialist consultants (logistics, HR, finance, marketing, production)

Conditions for success

  • Grouping 5-6 non-competing firms per consultant to share delivery cost without direct competition concerns
  • A recognised national SME association (ACOPI) to recruit and manage firm participation
  • Long-run follow-up survey design to confirm gains were not a short-lived Hawthorne effect

Common failure modes

  • Single sector (auto-parts suppliers), single country sample limits generalisation
  • No evidence yet of the pilot being scaled into a national ACOPI programme

Where it fits

Scale
159 SMEs, one supplier sector
Income level
upper-middle-income country

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Replication kit

Reusable artefacts from this practice — as published by their sources.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 91

Tehnopol Startup Incubator (Tallinn)

Estonia

Estonia's largest science park runs a startup incubator and themed accelerators (NATO DIANA, ESA BIC, AI, cyber) that have supported …