University of Sydney 'two-lane' assessment for the AI era
Australia
Instead of an unwinnable AI-detection arms race, Sydney redesigned assessment into two lanes — secure in-person assessment of core capability, …
South Africa · Cape Town · See the South Africa profile · See the Cape Town profile
Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 40% 53/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice
A University of Cape Town-led team fine-tuned open-source speech-recognition models to automatically score early-grade oral reading fluency in isiXhosa, using 14,971 recordings from South African grades 1–4, reaching about 91% diagnostic efficiency against human-labelled data.
Early Grade Reading Assessments (EGRA) are one-on-one oral reading tests used to flag which children are falling behind in literacy, and are the standard tool in low- and middle-income countries, but they require trained human assessors and are rarely available in African languages beyond the few with existing speech-recognition support.
A research team led by the University of Cape Town, with the University of Pretoria, Western Sydney University, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco and Macquarie University, set out to automate EGRA scoring for isiXhosa, one of South Africa's official languages.
Over an 8-month data-collection effort supported by a Gates Foundation Grand Challenges grant, the team gathered 14,971 EGRA recordings, more than 19 hours of child speech, from grades 1-4 in South African schools; three independent human markers first validated the scoring approach against an EGRA expert, and fine-tuned speech-recognition models were then benchmarked against that human-labelled data.
The human markers reached 85% agreement with the EGRA expert, and the fine-tuned speech-recognition models reached roughly 91% diagnostic efficiency against the human-labelled data.
The published evaluation notes that no single model configuration minimised both false-positive and false-negative error rates simultaneously, meaning any early deployment would trade one kind of misclassification for another, and the work remains a research-stage validation rather than a fielded national assessment system.
Philanthropic / foundation funding
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
Australia
Instead of an unwinnable AI-detection arms race, Sydney redesigned assessment into two lanes — secure in-person assessment of core capability, …
Croatia
CARNET's ESF+-funded BrAIn project piloted Croatia's first AI curriculum in VET schools, covering responsible AI use, plagiarism and authorship crediting; …
United Kingdom
Free AI writing-feedback tool by Cambridge University Press & Assessment (Sept 2016); assigns CEFR A1–C2 levels to EFL essays and …
Brazil
Espírito Santo's public schools used the Letrus AI platform to give ENEM essay writers rapid feedback; a J-PAL randomized evaluation …
Open full copilot Grounded in cited practices — always check the sources.