evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Algeria's ICT-Accessibility Scorecard — Strong Institutional Capacity, but Half the Digital-Accessibility Policy Areas Still Empty

Algeria · Algiers · See the Algeria profile · See the Algiers profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 31% 84/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

G3ict's DARE Index ranks Algeria 42nd of 137 countries for digital-accessibility rights (49.5/100): full marks for institutional capacity, real policy in five domains — but zero policy on mobile, e-books, TV captioning and assistive technology.

25/25
DARE Index capacity-to-implement score
49.5/100
DARE Index composite score
92.26%
Primary-school completion, children with disabilities (2013)

Details

Promoter
G3ict (Global Initiative for Inclusive ICTs), evaluating the Government of Algeria
Period
2009–2022
Keywords
digital government, disability rights, ICT policy, accessibility

Context

Algeria ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in 2009 and, per G3ict's Digital Accessibility Rights Evaluation (DARE) Index, has since built real institutional capacity to act on it: the country scores a full 25 out of 25 on the index's 'capacity to implement' component, achieved by only a handful of the 137 countries assessed.

Results

That capacity has translated into policy in five of the ten ICT-accessibility areas the index tracks (web accessibility, inclusive ICT in education, employment enablement, e-government and smart cities, public procurement), each scoring 2-3 of 5. The other five areas score zero. The composite score is 49.5/100, 42nd globally and 6th in the Middle East and North Africa, with the outcomes component (12/50) the weakest of the index's three pillars.

Conclusions

Algeria's wider disability framework predates these digital-specific gaps: a 2002 law guarantees access to specialised hospitals and free transport, and primary-school completion for children with disabilities reached 92.26% by 2013, though secondary completion trailed at 58.36%. The same institutional follow-through has not yet extended into telecoms regulation, e-book accessibility standards or a national assistive-technology programme.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful