evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Papua New Guinea's Digital-Accessibility Gap — A 2025 WCAG Pledge Against a 9.5/100 DARE Index Score

Papua New Guinea · Port Moresby · See the Papua New Guinea profile · See the Port Moresby profile

Top 62% 64/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

PNG's National Information Center pledged WCAG 2.1 AA compliance for government sites from June 2025, but G3ict's DARE Index had scored the country just 9.5/100, with web, education, employment and e-government accessibility policy areas entirely absent.

Papua New Guinea's Digital-Accessibility Gap — A 2025 WCAG Pledge Against a 9.5/100 DARE Index Score

Details

Promoter
PNG National Information & Communications Technology Authority / National Information Center; G3ict (independent assessor)
Period
DARE Index assessment 2020; accessibility statement effective 18 June 2025
Keywords
digital government, ICT policy, disability rights

Description

G3ict's Digital Accessibility Rights Evaluation (DARE) Index, which benchmarks countries on disability-related ICT commitments, capacity and outcomes under CRPD Article 9, scored Papua New Guinea 9.5 out of 100 — 131st of the countries assessed and last among its East Asia & Pacific peers. The breakdown found PNG had no policy at all (0 of 5 points) in nine of ten measured areas, including web accessibility, mobile telephony, e-books, inclusive ICT in education and employment, e-government, and accessible procurement; only television/multimedia access showed partial (level 2) implementation.
PNG ratified the CRPD in 2013 but has not signed the Marrakesh Treaty, has no standalone disability-rights law with ICT-accessibility provisions, no dedicated accessible-ICT agency, and no formal mechanism for disability organisations to shape accessibility policy, per the same assessment.
Since then, PNG's National Information Center published an accessibility statement, effective 18 June 2025, committing government websites to WCAG 2.1 Level AA, screen-reader and screen-magnifier compatibility, keyboard navigation, alt text, captions and adjustable contrast, with an open channel for reporting barriers. This is a real, dated policy commitment, but it is a single agency's website statement rather than the cross-government legal mandate the DARE Index found missing, and no independent post-2025 audit of actual conformance has been published — the practice is included here as an honest, partially-verified case of an accessibility pledge issued against a documented baseline of near-total absence.

Read the full analysis: https://info.gov.pg/accessibility/

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful