evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

An AI-Powered Text Analytics Tool for the Reserve Bank of Australia's Business Liaison Program

Australia · Sydney · See the Australia profile · See the Sydney profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 50% 60/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

The RBA built an NLP tool mining 25 years of ~22,000 business liaison notes; added to wage-growth nowcasting models, it measurably cut forecast errors versus baseline methods, with code released for other central banks.

An AI-Powered Text Analytics Tool for the Reserve Bank of Australia's Business Liaison Program

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Reserve Bank of Australia
Period
2025-2026
Keywords
central banking, monetary policy, economic research, natural language processing

Context

Since 2001 the Reserve Bank of Australia's liaison program has sent staff to interview around 22,000 firms, industry bodies and community organisations, building a 25-year archive of qualitative notes on wages, prices, investment and business conditions used to inform monetary policy. Manually searching this large, free-text archive limited how systematically the RBA could draw signals from it.

Objectives

RBA Research Discussion Paper 2025-06 (Gray, Lattimore, McLoughlin and Windsor, August 2025) describes building an NLP system to search the full liaison archive on demand, classify the topic and tone of each note, and extract precise numerical figures — such as a firm's self-reported wage or price growth — directly from free text.

Activities

The team validated the tool's extractions against human-coded benchmarks, then tested whether the resulting liaison-based indicators improved wage-growth nowcasting models when added to best-practice machine-learning and Phillips-curve approaches. The RBA published its code openly so other central banks could adapt the approach.

Results

Adding the AI-derived liaison signals to wage-growth nowcasting models significantly reduced nowcasting errors by meaningful magnitudes compared with baseline approaches. As of the paper's release, no other central bank had yet reported adopting the released code.

Conclusions

The authors stress that despite strong quantitative performance, it will always remain critical for economists using the tool to interrogate, validate and apply judgement to its outputs rather than treat them as ground truth. This is a single institution's internal research evaluation, not an externally replicated trial.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Short (< 1 year)
Staffing & skills
RBA in-house economic research team (Gray, Lattimore, McLoughlin, Windsor)

Conditions for success

  • AI extractions validated against human-coded benchmarks before use in forecasting
  • Explicit institutional guidance that economists must interrogate, validate and apply judgement to model outputs rather than treat them as ground truth
  • Open-sourcing the code to enable external scrutiny and adaptation by other central banks

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful