evidoria

What works in Australia

All catalogues

68
evaluated practices
61/100
average quality score
8%
strong evidence, of 53 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Australia

Australia has made significant progress in workplace transparency and digital inclusion. The WGEA's 2024 gender pay gap disclosure revealed a median employer gap of 9.1% across ~5,000 employers, with 51% reducing their gap year-on-year under this statutory mechanism. The Australian Government's Microsoft 365 Copilot trial — the world's largest whole-of-government AI trial — engaged 5,000+ staff across ~60 agencies and found 77% satisfaction and up to an hour saved daily, though the evidence does not quantify long-term productivity or job-displacement outcomes. inDigiMOB has employed 169 Indigenous Digital Mentors to reach 14,000+ participants in remote communities since 2016, narrowing but not closing the digital exclusion gap for First Nations Australians.

Drawn from: Australia's WGEA Employer-Level Gender Pay Gap Disclosure (2024) · Australia's Whole-of-Government Microsoft 365 Copilot Trial · Centre for Inclusive Design — Turning Accessibility Into a Four-Times-Bigger Market Case · inDigiMOB — Indigenous Digital Mentors for Remote Communities · NVDA (NonVisual Desktop Access): Free Open-Source Screen Reader for Blind and Low-Vision Computer Users · Ask Izzy — Digital Service-Finder for People Experiencing Homelessness · Be Connected · Carer Gateway — National Digital and Phone Support Service for Unpaid Carers

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +21 pts 28 here · 7 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +16 pts 64 here · 48 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +13 pts 89 here · 76 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value +13 pts 72 here · 59 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +11 pts 61 here · 50 average

Governance, certification & transferability +10 pts 75 here · 64 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Equity & inclusion -11 pts 42 here · 52 average

Achievement / evidence -11 pts 80 here · 91 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -19 pts 32 here · 50 average

Inclusiveness / equity -20 pts 22 here · 42 average

Efficiency -24 pts 20 here · 44 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 45
Documented learning
100 · 74
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
28 · 7
Transparency, ethics & data protection
64 · 48
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
89 · 76
Transparency, fairness & accountability
67 · 54
Evidence of impact / measured public value
72 · 59
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
61 · 50
Governance, certification & transferability
75 · 64
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
37 · 31
Curator validation
80 · 74
Sustainability (ongoing)
83 · 78
Scalability beyond pilot
68 · 64
Effectiveness
80 · 77
Teacher capability & pedagogy
39 · 37
Impact on gender equality
80 · 80
Innovation level
60 · 63
Transferability / demonstrated replication
56 · 59
Evidence of learning impact
22 · 28
Demonstrated reach
69 · 76
Equity & inclusion
42 · 52
Achievement / evidence
80 · 91
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
32 · 50
Inclusiveness / equity
22 · 42
Efficiency
20 · 44

Coloured bar: Australia. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Australia's WGEA Employer-Level Gender Pay Gap Disclosure (2024) · 96

Australia's Whole-of-Government Microsoft 365 Copilot Trial · 93

Centre for Inclusive Design — Turning Accessibility Into a Four-Times-Bigger Market Case · 92

inDigiMOB — Indigenous Digital Mentors for Remote Communities · 92

NVDA (NonVisual Desktop Access): Free Open-Source Screen Reader for Blind and Low-Vision Computer Users · 92

Ask Izzy — Digital Service-Finder for People Experiencing Homelessness · 92

Be Connected · 92

Carer Gateway — National Digital and Phone Support Service for Unpaid Carers · 88

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Australia concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Bogotá's Care Blocks (Manzanas del Cuidado) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more