evidoria

What works in Australia

All catalogues

97
evaluated practices
59/100
average quality score
7%
strong evidence, of 76 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Australia

Australia's evidence practices demonstrate significant progress on workplace transparency and digital inclusion, though with persistent gaps. Australia's WGEA Employer-Level Gender Pay Gap Disclosure (2024) shows a median employer gender pay gap of 9.1%, with 51% of employers reducing their gap in 2024–25, while Australia's Whole-of-Government Microsoft 365 Copilot Trial achieved the world's largest whole-of-government AI trial across 5,000+ staff in almost 60 agencies, with 77% participant satisfaction. Digital inclusion initiatives like inDigiMOB have reached 14,000+ participants and employed 169 Indigenous mentors in remote communities, though RMIT's Australian Digital Inclusion Index finds First Nations Australians in remote areas still roughly twice as likely to be digitally excluded despite an 8.7-point improvement between 2023–2025. Centre for Inclusive Design research modelled that inclusive design could unlock AUD 4.5 billion in potential earnings impact for Australia's 5 million digitally excluded people.

Drawn from: Australia's WGEA Employer-Level Gender Pay Gap Disclosure (2024) · Australia's Whole-of-Government Microsoft 365 Copilot Trial · Centre for Inclusive Design — Turning Accessibility Into a Four-Times-Bigger Market Case · inDigiMOB — Indigenous Digital Mentors for Remote Communities · NVDA (NonVisual Desktop Access): Free Open-Source Screen Reader for Blind and Low-Vision Computer Users · Ask Izzy — Digital Service-Finder for People Experiencing Homelessness · Be Connected · Carer Gateway — National Digital and Phone Support Service for Unpaid Carers

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +38 pts 87 here · 49 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +20 pts 67 here · 47 average

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +15 pts 21 here · 6 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +15 pts 69 here · 54 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +15 pts 62 here · 48 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +14 pts 88 here · 74 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value +12 pts 69 here · 57 average

Governance, certification & transferability +9 pts 72 here · 64 average

Weaknesses

Demonstrated reach -9 pts 67 here · 76 average

Efficiency -10 pts 21 here · 32 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -11 pts 38 here · 48 average

Inclusiveness / equity -16 pts 27 here · 43 average

Curator validation -16 pts 57 here · 73 average

Effectiveness -16 pts 50 here · 66 average

Impact on gender equality -27 pts 43 here · 70 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
87 · 49
Documented learning
100 · 74
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 47
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
21 · 6
Transparency, fairness & accountability
69 · 54
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
62 · 48
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
88 · 74
Evidence of impact / measured public value
69 · 57
Governance, certification & transferability
72 · 64
Scalability beyond pilot
67 · 62
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
93 · 89
Sustainability (ongoing)
82 · 78
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
31 · 27
Transferability / demonstrated replication
62 · 60
Teacher capability & pedagogy
40 · 38
Evaluated outcomes
79 · 78
Achievement / evidence
86 · 87
Innovation level
60 · 62
Evidence of learning impact
21 · 26
Equity & inclusion
44 · 50
Demonstrated reach
67 · 76
Efficiency
21 · 32
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
38 · 48
Inclusiveness / equity
27 · 43
Curator validation
57 · 73
Effectiveness
50 · 66
Impact on gender equality
43 · 70

Coloured bar: Australia. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Australia's WGEA Employer-Level Gender Pay Gap Disclosure (2024) · 96

Australia's Whole-of-Government Microsoft 365 Copilot Trial · 93

Centre for Inclusive Design — Turning Accessibility Into a Four-Times-Bigger Market Case · 92

inDigiMOB — Indigenous Digital Mentors for Remote Communities · 92

NVDA (NonVisual Desktop Access): Free Open-Source Screen Reader for Blind and Low-Vision Computer Users · 92

Ask Izzy — Digital Service-Finder for People Experiencing Homelessness · 92

Be Connected · 92

Carer Gateway — National Digital and Phone Support Service for Unpaid Carers · 88

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Australia concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more