vTaiwan — Taiwan's AI-assisted public deliberation platform for policy-making
Taiwan
AI-assisted civic deliberation platform run by Taiwan's PDIS, using open-source Polis AI to map consensus on ~30 policy issues since …
Estonia · Tallinn · See the Estonia profile · See the Tallinn profile
Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 83% 40/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice
After a one-word drafting slip left Estonia's online casinos untaxed for 2026 — an estimated €2m/month loss — a former government CIO built Apsakaleidja, an AI tool that scans every draft bill before parliament for the kind of error that caused it.
In January 2026, a routine wording slip in an amendment to Estonia's Gambling Tax Act omitted the word for 'games of chance' (õnnemängud), leaving only 'games of skill' (osavusmängud) covered by a tax increase — an error that would have cost roughly €2 million a month in lost revenue if left uncorrected before the law took effect. Luukas Ilves, a former deputy secretary general for digital development at Estonia's Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications and now an advisor on Ukraine's digital transformation, built a prototype called Apsakaleidja ('mistake-finder') in a matter of hours to see whether AI could have caught the mistake. The tool pulls every draft bill currently before the Riigikogu, feeds it to large language models, and flags inconsistent use of defined terms, broken cross-references, contradictions between a bill's explanatory memorandum and its legal text, arithmetic errors and impossible dates.
When Ilves ran the gambling tax amendment through Claude and Gemini, both models immediately identified the missing word. Applied to the 112 bills before parliament at the time, Apsakaleidja flagged 102 as high-risk for this class of error. Estonian Prime Minister Kristen Michal publicly urged the Riigikogu to start using AI tools like this to check bills, and Riigikogu officials told Ilves they had already used the prototype to catch and fix new drafting slips.
Apsakaleidja is not (yet) an official parliamentary system: it is an independent civic-tech prototype built and run outside any formal procurement or oversight process, with no published accuracy evaluation, error-rate audit, or funding commitment behind it.
National / regional programmes Digital Europe Programme
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
Taiwan
AI-assisted civic deliberation platform run by Taiwan's PDIS, using open-source Polis AI to map consensus on ~30 policy issues since …
New Zealand
New Zealand's Parliamentary Counsel Office ran a six-month, five-partner R&D programme fine-tuning an 8-billion-parameter model on 200 examples of NZ …
France
Founded by three independent researchers after France's 2016 transparency law went largely unenforced, ODAP catalogues government algorithms. Its Nov 2025 …
Chile
Chile's Chamber of Deputies built CAMINAR, a four-part generative-AI suite for bill drafting, transcription and regulatory-impact review, using closed authorised …
Open full copilot Grounded in cited practices — always check the sources.