evidoria

What works in Estonia

All catalogues

47
evaluated practices
61/100
average quality score
2%
strong evidence, of 41 assessed
6
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Estonia

Drawn from: Estonian Women's Studies and Resource Centre (ENUT) · Look@World Foundation – 'Come Along!' Digital Literacy Campaign · Transforming Gender Roles in Research: The GEARING-Roles Project and ETAG's Involvement · Unlocking Female Potential: The "Everything is Possible" Entrepreneurship Program · Tehnopol Startup Incubator (Tallinn) · Empowering Women Entrepreneurs: Green and Caring World Initiative · SATIKAS — Estonia's Deep-Learning Satellite System Monitors 100% of Grasslands for CAP Mowing Compliance · Bürokratt — Estonia's national AI assistant for public services

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Efficiency +44 pts 75 here · 32 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +29 pts 67 here · 38 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +24 pts 72 here · 48 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +19 pts 67 here · 48 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +17 pts 70 here · 54 average

Governance, capability & sustainability +14 pts 78 here · 64 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +14 pts 61 here · 47 average

Inclusiveness / equity +14 pts 57 here · 43 average

Scalability +13 pts 75 here · 62 average

Effectiveness +9 pts 75 here · 66 average

Weaknesses

Achievement / evidence -15 pts 71 here · 87 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -18 pts 71 here · 89 average

Demonstrated reach -18 pts 57 here · 76 average

Evaluation evidence -20 pts 29 here · 49 average

Documented learning -31 pts 43 here · 74 average

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
75 · 32
Teacher capability & pedagogy
67 · 38
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
72 · 48
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 48
Transparency, fairness & accountability
70 · 54
Governance, capability & sustainability
78 · 64
Transparency, ethics & data protection
61 · 47
Inclusiveness / equity
57 · 43
Scalability
75 · 62
Effectiveness
75 · 66
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 27
Equity & inclusion
56 · 50
Innovation level
68 · 62
Evaluated outcomes
83 · 78
Transferability / replicability
64 · 60
Sustainability
81 · 78
Impact on gender equality
71 · 70
Evidence of learning impact
28 · 26
Evidence of impact / measured results
58 · 57
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
6 · 6
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 74
Curator validation
65 · 73
Achievement / evidence
71 · 87
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
71 · 89
Demonstrated reach
57 · 76
Evaluation evidence
29 · 49
Documented learning
43 · 74

Coloured bar: Estonia. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Estonian Women's Studies and Resource Centre (ENUT) · 96

Look@World Foundation – 'Come Along!' Digital Literacy Campaign · 92

Transforming Gender Roles in Research: The GEARING-Roles Project and ETAG's Involvement · 91

Unlocking Female Potential: The "Everything is Possible" Entrepreneurship Program · 91

Tehnopol Startup Incubator (Tallinn) · 91

Empowering Women Entrepreneurs: Green and Caring World Initiative · 87

SATIKAS — Estonia's Deep-Learning Satellite System Monitors 100% of Grasslands for CAP Mowing Compliance · 87

Bürokratt — Estonia's national AI assistant for public services · 87

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Estonia concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more