evidoria

What works in Estonia

All catalogues

33
evaluated practices
67/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 31 assessed
6
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Estonia

Estonia has pursued systematic efforts to advance gender equality and women's economic participation through multiple initiatives. The Estonian Women's Studies and Resource Centre (ENUT) promotes women's representation in decision-making via research and advocacy, while the "Everything is Possible" entrepreneurship program engaged 100 female entrepreneurs in growth coaching and mentoring across five cities. Estonia has also prioritized digital inclusion: the Look@World Foundation's "Come Along!" campaign trained over 100,000 adults (approximately 10% of the adult population) in basic computer and internet skills between 2002–2004, during a period when Estonia's internet-user share rose from 28.6% (2000) to 91.4% (2016). Additionally, Tehnopol startup incubator has supported 600+ startups and 800+ entrepreneurs that collectively raised over €40 million, though the evidence does not specify gender breakdown for these outcomes.

Drawn from: Estonian Women's Studies and Resource Centre (ENUT) · Look@World Foundation – 'Come Along!' Digital Literacy Campaign · Transforming Gender Roles in Research: The GEARING-Roles Project and ETAG's Involvement · Unlocking Female Potential: The "Everything is Possible" Entrepreneurship Program · Tehnopol Startup Incubator (Tallinn) · Empowering Women Entrepreneurs: Green and Caring World Initiative · Bürokratt — Estonia's national AI assistant for public services · TTJA's Three-Year Web Accessibility Monitoring — Estonia's Non-Conformity Rate Falls from 18.9% to 12.44%

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Efficiency +56 pts 100 here · 44 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +49 pts 100 here · 51 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +39 pts 89 here · 50 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +36 pts 67 here · 31 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +29 pts 67 here · 37 average

Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Inclusiveness / equity +20 pts 62 here · 42 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +19 pts 67 here · 48 average

Governance, capability & sustainability +19 pts 83 here · 64 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +18 pts 71 here · 54 average

Evaluated outcomes +15 pts 100 here · 85 average

Innovation level +9 pts 72 here · 63 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Curator validation +9 pts 84 here · 74 average

Scalability +9 pts 72 here · 64 average

Sustainability +8 pts 87 here · 78 average

Weaknesses

Evaluation evidence -11 pts 33 here · 45 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -13 pts 78 here · 91 average

Documented learning -24 pts 50 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach -26 pts 50 here · 76 average

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
100 · 44
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
100 · 51
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
89 · 50
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
67 · 31
Teacher capability & pedagogy
67 · 37
Effectiveness
100 · 77
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Inclusiveness / equity
62 · 42
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 48
Governance, capability & sustainability
83 · 64
Transparency, fairness & accountability
71 · 54
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 85
Innovation level
72 · 63
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Curator validation
84 · 74
Scalability
72 · 64
Sustainability
87 · 78
Transferability / replicability
67 · 60
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
11 · 7
Equity & inclusion
56 · 52
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
76 · 76
Evidence of impact / measured results
57 · 59
Evidence of learning impact
22 · 28
Evaluation evidence
33 · 45
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
78 · 91
Documented learning
50 · 74
Demonstrated reach
50 · 76

Coloured bar: Estonia. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Estonian Women's Studies and Resource Centre (ENUT) · 96

Look@World Foundation – 'Come Along!' Digital Literacy Campaign · 92

Transforming Gender Roles in Research: The GEARING-Roles Project and ETAG's Involvement · 91

Unlocking Female Potential: The "Everything is Possible" Entrepreneurship Program · 91

Tehnopol Startup Incubator (Tallinn) · 91

Empowering Women Entrepreneurs: Green and Caring World Initiative · 87

Bürokratt — Estonia's national AI assistant for public services · 87

TTJA's Three-Year Web Accessibility Monitoring — Estonia's Non-Conformity Rate Falls from 18.9% to 12.44% · 84

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Estonia concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Pikin Tab — Imagine Worldwide's Solar-Powered Tablet Learning Programme in Sierra Leone · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Empowering Global Leadership: The Role of International Women's Forum Finland in Advancing Women's Leadership and Gender Equality · fit 84/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Matches your scale
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more