evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Barrios de Verdad — Participatory Neighbourhood Upgrading in La Paz

Bolivia · La Paz · See the Bolivia profile · See the La Paz profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 21% 81/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Since 2000, La Paz's municipal government has upgraded more than 100 of the city's poorest hillside neighbourhoods through 'Barrios de Verdad,' combining resident-designed infrastructure with World Bank and IADB co-financing, reaching over 50,000 residents.

100+ neighbourhoods
Urban neighbourhoods upgraded (2000/2005–early 2020s)
50,000+ residents
Residents reached
26.7 million bolivianos
Cost of one documented four-neighbourhood tranche
2,338 families
Families benefited in that tranche
Barrios de Verdad — Participatory Neighbourhood Upgrading in La Paz

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Gobierno Autónomo Municipal de La Paz (GAMLP)
Period
2000/2005–present
Keywords
informal settlement upgrading, participatory planning, municipal infrastructure, urban regeneration

Context

La Paz's steep, informal peri-urban neighbourhoods (laderas) historically lacked paved access, stairways, retaining walls, lighting and public space, leaving residents — many of them low-income, Indigenous Aymara migrant families — exposed to landslide risk and social exclusion from the wealthier city centre below.

Objectives

Upgrade one selected neighbourhood at a time through resident-designed infrastructure that reduces landslide risk and connects poor peri-urban neighbourhoods to city services.

Activities

GAMLP launched Barrios de Verdad, formalised in 2005, following a fixed sequence: a neighbourhood assembly identifies priority works, a joint technical-resident committee co-designs the intervention using a standard Neighbourhood Improvement Guide, the municipality builds it with World Bank and Inter-American Development Bank co-financing, and a resident committee oversees execution and maintenance afterward.

Results

By the early 2020s the programme had intervened in over 100 urban neighbourhoods (with a parallel "Comunidades de Verdad" track for rural areas), reaching more than 50,000 residents with paved streets, stairways, retaining walls, sports courts, community centres and public lighting; one documented tranche of four neighbourhoods cost 26.7 million bolivianos and benefited 2,338 families. The programme won the Barcelona FAD "City to City" award in 2013 and was highlighted by the World Bank as a reference model for participatory upgrading.

Conclusions

La Paz has hosted peer exchanges with Guatemalan municipal officials seeking to adapt the model, and the World Bank has backed a follow-on effort to scale the approach to other Bolivian cities; programme evaluations note that quality and pace of delivery vary by neighbourhood and administration, and long-term maintenance after handover still depends on continued resident-committee engagement rather than guaranteed municipal upkeep.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — One documented tranche of four neighbourhoods cost 26.7 million bolivianos and benefited 2,338 families; the wider programme is co-financed by the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Launched 2000, formalised in 2005; upgrades one neighbourhood at a time, reaching 100+ neighbourhoods by the early 2020s.
Staffing & skills
Joint technical-resident committee co-designs each intervention using a standard Neighbourhood Improvement Guide; a resident committee oversees execution and maintenance after handover

Conditions for success

  • neighbourhood assembly identifies priority works before design starts
  • standardised Neighbourhood Improvement Guide used for co-design
  • continued resident-committee engagement for post-handover maintenance
  • World Bank / IADB co-financing

Common failure modes

  • quality and pace of delivery vary by neighbourhood and administration
  • long-term maintenance depends on continued resident-committee engagement rather than guaranteed municipal upkeep

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful