evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Belarus's 40% Women in Parliament — High Numbers Inside a Non-Free Election

Belarus · Minsk · See the Belarus profile · See the Minsk profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 87% 22/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

40% of deputies elected to Belarus's House of Representatives in Nov 2019 were women, among Europe's highest shares. OSCE/ODIHR and Freedom House found the same election failed democratic standards — high descriptive representation can coexist with an unfree system.

40 %
Women elected to Belarus's House of Representatives (2019)
31 %
Observed vote counts receiving negative procedural evaluations (2019)
Belarus's 40% Women in Parliament — High Numbers Inside a Non-Free Election

Details

Promoter
House of Representatives, National Assembly of the Republic of Belarus
Period
2019–2025
Keywords
political representation, electoral integrity, authoritarian governance

Context

Belarus's early parliamentary elections of 17 November 2019 returned a House of Representatives that was 40% women — one of the higher shares of female legislators in Europe at the time, according to Freedom House and World Bank/IPU indicators. The same election was assessed by the OSCE/ODIHR observation mission as failing to meet OSCE commitments and international democratic standards, citing the absence of genuine political competition, opaque candidate registration that barred credible opposition contenders, and vote-counting irregularities. Freedom House's 2020 report notes that candidates loyal to President Lukashenka won every seat, with independent candidates winning none.

Results

This entry is treated as a cautionary case rather than a positive model: a high female-representation statistic achieved without competitive elections illustrates the gap between descriptive representation (how many seats women formally hold) and substantive representation (whether elected officials exercise genuine, independent political power).

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Short (< 1 year)

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful