evidoria

What works in Belarus

All catalogues

7
evaluated practices
36/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 6 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Belarus

Drawn from: Belarus National Peatland Rewetting Programme — 89,400 ha Restored (2007–2030) · Belarus Hi-Tech Park — A Tax-Free Zone That Grew, Then Lost, Its Tech Talent · Belarus National Curriculum Reform — Artificial Intelligence Integrated into Grades 6–9 Informatics · Belarus's National Statistics Committee Deploys an NLP Chatbot for Respondent Support · Belarus's 40% Women in Parliament — High Numbers Inside a Non-Free Election · #ionline: Nationwide Digital Literacy Training for Older Adults · Belarus's Kipod AI Video-Analytics Platform — Facial Recognition Used to Track and Prosecute 2020 Protesters

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +94 pts 100 here · 6 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +52 pts 100 here · 48 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +40 pts 67 here · 27 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Evaluated outcomes +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +19 pts 67 here · 48 average

Equity & inclusion +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Innovation level +12 pts 73 here · 62 average

Weaknesses

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average

Governance, certification & transferability -19 pts 44 here · 64 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -24 pts 33 here · 57 average

Evidence of learning impact -26 pts 0 here · 26 average

Transferability / replicability -27 pts 33 here · 60 average

Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -37 pts 17 here · 54 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -38 pts 0 here · 38 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -40 pts 33 here · 74 average

Inclusiveness / equity -43 pts 0 here · 43 average

Evaluation evidence -49 pts 0 here · 49 average

Effectiveness -66 pts 0 here · 66 average

Impact on gender equality -70 pts 0 here · 70 average

Documented learning -74 pts 0 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach -76 pts 0 here · 76 average

Sustainability -78 pts 0 here · 78 average

Achievement / evidence -87 pts 0 here · 87 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -89 pts 0 here · 89 average

Score profile vs peers

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
100 · 6
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
100 · 48
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
67 · 27
Curator validation
100 · 73
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 78
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
67 · 48
Equity & inclusion
67 · 50
Innovation level
73 · 62
Scalability & sustainability
58 · 62
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 47
Governance, certification & transferability
44 · 64
Evidence of impact / measured public value
33 · 57
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 26
Transferability / replicability
33 · 60
Efficiency
0 · 32
Transparency, fairness & accountability
17 · 54
Teacher capability & pedagogy
0 · 38
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
33 · 74
Inclusiveness / equity
0 · 43
Evaluation evidence
0 · 49
Effectiveness
0 · 66
Impact on gender equality
0 · 70
Documented learning
0 · 74
Demonstrated reach
0 · 76
Sustainability
0 · 78
Achievement / evidence
0 · 87
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
0 · 89

Coloured bar: Belarus. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Belarus National Peatland Rewetting Programme — 89,400 ha Restored (2007–2030) · 87

Belarus Hi-Tech Park — A Tax-Free Zone That Grew, Then Lost, Its Tech Talent · 48

Belarus National Curriculum Reform — Artificial Intelligence Integrated into Grades 6–9 Informatics · 40

Belarus's National Statistics Committee Deploys an NLP Chatbot for Respondent Support · 27

Belarus's 40% Women in Parliament — High Numbers Inside a Non-Free Election · 22

#ionline: Nationwide Digital Literacy Training for Older Adults · 16

Belarus's Kipod AI Video-Analytics Platform — Facial Recognition Used to Track and Prosecute 2020 Protesters · 13

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Belarus concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more