evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Bændur græða landið — Iceland's National Land Reclamation Payment Scheme

Iceland · Gunnarsholt · See the Iceland profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 64% 40/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Iceland's 'Bændur græða landið' scheme pays farmers fertiliser, seed and cash to revegetate eroded land, run by the state Soil Conservation Service (est. 1907), now Land og skógur. About 600 farmers and 3,800 hectares were treated in the 2024 grant round alone.

418
Farms supported in 2024 grant round (2024)
3,800 ha
Land treated in 2024 grant round (2024)
about 600
Farmers participating nationwide
about 85 %
Historical cost share covered by scheme
0.4-2.2 tonnes C/ha/year
Soil-carbon accumulation, restoration site
Bændur græða landið — Iceland's National Land Reclamation Payment Scheme

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Land og skógur (Land and Forest Iceland, formerly Landgræðsla ríkisins — Soil Conservation Service of Iceland)
Period
1994-present
Region (NUTS)
IS00
Keywords
soil conservation, land reclamation, erosion control, revegetation, sheep farming

Context

Bændur græða landið ('Farmers Reclaim the Land') is one of the world's longest-running state land-reclamation payment schemes, run by Iceland's Soil Conservation Service (Landgræðsla ríkisins, founded 1907), which merged into Land og skógur (Land and Forest Iceland) in January 2024. The agency supplies participating farmers with fertiliser, grass and tree seed, and matching payments to revegetate eroded pastures and desertified home-fields. Formal farmer cooperation under the scheme is dated to either 1990 or 1994 depending on the source, though the agency's erosion-control mandate itself is over a century old.

Activities

Participating farmers receive fertiliser, seed (including red fescue, lyme grass and downy birch) and cash matching payments to revegetate eroded land, historically with the scheme covering about 85% of seed and fertiliser costs while farmers contribute labour and transport.

Results

In the 2024 grant round, 418 farms received support covering roughly 3,800 hectares — about 3,500 ha treated with mineral fertiliser and 300 ha with organic amendments. Around 600 farmers nationwide participate, including about a fifth of Iceland's sheep farmers, up from roughly 370 participants in the mid-1990s. An independent peer-reviewed study of one restoration site in southwest Iceland measured soil-carbon accumulation of 0.4-2.2 tonnes of carbon per hectare per year, depending on whether the land was revegetated with grass or trees.

Conclusions

The scheme's evidence base has real limits: no public aggregate budget figure could be verified, official monitoring relies on roughly biennial agency site visits rather than independent audit, and a widely repeated total of hectares reclaimed since 1907 could not be traced to a primary source. The carbon figures come from a single external academic case study rather than a programme-wide accounting system.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — No public aggregate budget figure could be verified; the 2024 round distributed fertiliser, seed and cash matching payments to 418 farms, with the scheme historically covering about 85% of costs.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — The underlying agency's erosion-control mandate dates to 1907 and formal farmer cooperation to 1990/1994; the scheme is ongoing with no defined end date.
Staffing & skills
Land og skógur (formerly Landgræðsla ríkisins, Iceland's Soil Conservation Service) field staff conduct roughly biennial site visits, Participating farmers contribute labour and transport

Conditions for success

  • Matching-payment model covering about 85% of seed and fertiliser costs, with farmers contributing labour and transport
  • Century-long institutional continuity of a dedicated state soil-conservation agency
  • National distribution infrastructure for fertiliser and native seed (red fescue, lyme grass, downy birch)

Common failure modes

  • Monitoring relies on periodic agency site visits rather than independent audit
  • No public aggregate budget figure or programme-wide impact accounting was found

Where it fits

Governance type
national state agency
Scale
national (3,800 ha, ~600 farmers in 2024)
Income level
high-income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful