evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Bogotá Cómo Vamos — Citizen-Led Quality-of-Life Monitoring Network

Colombia · Bogotá · See the Colombia profile · See the Bogotá profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 19% 81/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Since 1997, a business–media–academia coalition has tracked Bogotá's quality of life through annual citizen perception surveys and an open indicators platform, becoming a model replicated in 40+ Colombian cities and 10+ more across Latin America.

61 %
Satisfaction with Bogotá as a place to live (2025)
5 percentage points
Year-on-year increase in satisfaction with Bogotá as a place to live (2024-2025)
40+
Colombian cities/municipalities that have replicated the model
10+
Further programmes replicating the model elsewhere in Latin America

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Bogotá Cómo Vamos (Bogotá Chamber of Commerce, Fundación Corona, El Tiempo, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana)
Period
1997–present
Keywords
civic data, open data, citizen monitoring, accountability, quality of life

Context

Bogotá Cómo Vamos was founded in 1997-98 by a coalition of non-governmental actors — the Bogotá Chamber of Commerce, Fundación Corona, the newspaper El Tiempo, and (from 2010) the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana — to independently track whether the city's public policies were actually improving residents' quality of life, outside of any political campaign cycle.

Objectives

To hold successive Bogotá administrations accountable, regardless of political party, by independently and continuously measuring how public policy affects residents' quality of life.

Activities

Each year the initiative runs a large-scale Citizen Perception Survey alongside a technical indicators report covering health, mobility, security, environment and public services. Since 2013 it has published the underlying data on an open platform (api.bogotacomovamos.org), used by city council, media and civil society.

Results

The model has been adopted by more than 40 other Colombian cities and municipalities and by at least 10 more programmes elsewhere in Latin America, coordinated through the Red de Ciudades Cómo Vamos network. In the 2025 survey, satisfaction with Bogotá as a place to live rose to 61%, up 5 points on 2024.

Conclusions

The evidence base is strongest on reach and continuity. Because the core method is self-reported perception rather than an experimental evaluation, it measures how residents feel about city performance rather than proving causal policy impact.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
Bogotá Chamber of Commerce staff, Fundación Corona programme staff, El Tiempo newspaper (media dissemination), Pontificia Universidad Javeriana researchers (from 2010)

Conditions for success

  • A stable, multi-founder coalition spanning business, philanthropy, media and academia
  • Independence from any single political administration or campaign cycle
  • Continuous annual publication of both perception survey and technical indicators
  • Open publication of underlying data for reuse by council, media and civil society

Where it fits

Governance type
multi-stakeholder civic coalition (non-governmental)
Scale
citywide, replicated nationally and regionally
Income level
upper-middle-income (Colombia)

Commonly funded by

Philanthropic / foundation funding

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful