evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Bolama-Bijagos - Customary Taboo and UNESCO Statute Together Protect Africa's Largest Green-Turtle Nesting Ground (Guinea-Bissau)

Guinea-Bissau · Bubaque · See the Guinea-Bissau profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 41% 47/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

UNESCO named the 88-island Bijagos a Biosphere Reserve in 1996 and, in July 2025, a World Heritage Site. On the 43-hectare sacred island of Poilao alone, 7,000-29,000 green-turtle nests are laid yearly - protected as much by Bijago customary taboo as by IBAP park rangers.

10,000+ km2
Area covered by World Heritage inscription (2025)
~870,000
Migratory shorebirds recorded annually
7,000-29,000
Green-turtle nests per season on Poilao island
~5 %
Share of species' global nesting population on Poilao
Bolama-Bijagos - Customary Taboo and UNESCO Statute Together Protect Africa's Largest Green-Turtle Nesting Ground (Guinea-Bissau)

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Instituto da Biodiversidade e das Areas Protegidas (IBAP)
Period
1996-2026
Keywords
biodiversity conservation, mangroves, marine turtles, community governance

Context

The Bolama-Bijagos Archipelago off Guinea-Bissau comprises 88 low-lying islands and islets of mangrove, mudflat and savanna at the mouth of West Africa's only active river delta on the Atlantic coast. UNESCO designated the archipelago a Biosphere Reserve in 1996, and on 11 July 2025 the World Heritage Committee inscribed 'Coastal and Marine Ecosystems of the Bijagos Archipelago - Omati Minho,' covering more than 10,000 km2 of islands, sandbanks and mudflats, under natural criteria (ix) and (x).

Activities

Formal protection through the Joao Vieira and Poilao Marine National Park, managed by Guinea-Bissau's Institute for Biodiversity and Protected Areas (IBAP) with park rangers present for roughly the last decade, layers onto -- rather than replaces -- pre-existing Bijago customary law: Poilao and other nesting islands are considered sacred and taboo to outsiders, and several ethnic groups in the region traditionally do not eat turtle meat or eggs, a belief system that conservationists credit with protecting the nesting beaches long before any state agency existed.

Results

The archipelago is Africa's most important green-turtle (Chelonia mydas) nesting ground and West Africa's second-most-important site for migratory shorebirds, with an estimated 870,000 birds recorded annually. On the 43-hectare island of Poilao alone, researchers have counted between roughly 7,000 and 29,000 green-turtle nests in a season -- around 5% of the species' global nesting population concentrated on one island.

Conclusions

The July 2025 World Heritage inscription is recent enough that its effect on funding and enforcement is not yet independently evaluated; IBAP's protected-area network operates in one of the world's lower-income countries, and its historical challenges have included limited ranger capacity and illegal fishing pressure -- the practice's durability rests heavily on the customary taboo system continuing to hold alongside statutory protection.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — National protected-area management (IBAP); specific budget not itemised.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Biosphere Reserve since 1996; park rangers present roughly the last decade; World Heritage inscription July 2025.
Staffing & skills
Institute for Biodiversity and Protected Areas (IBAP), Guinea-Bissau, park rangers, Bijago customary community leaders

Conditions for success

  • Customary taboo system (sacred/taboo status, no consumption of turtle meat/eggs) layered onto statutory park protection
  • Decade of ranger presence

Common failure modes

  • Limited ranger capacity and illegal fishing pressure historically challenge IBAP's protected-area network
  • Effect of the 2025 World Heritage inscription on funding and enforcement not yet independently evaluated

Where it fits

Governance type
national protected-area agency plus customary/community law
Scale
archipelago-wide (Guinea-Bissau)
Income level
low-income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful