evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

BOSCO Uganda — Solar-Powered Community WiFi Linking Post-Conflict Northern Uganda

Uganda · Gulu · See the Uganda profile

Top 55% 72/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Since 2007, BOSCO Uganda has run a solar-powered, community-owned WiFi network spanning over 160km, linking 54 ICT centres and six refugee settlements in northern Uganda so war-displaced communities can get online, make VoIP calls and earn income from digital services.

BOSCO Uganda — Solar-Powered Community WiFi Linking Post-Conflict Northern Uganda

Details

Promoter
BOSCO Uganda (Battery Operated Systems for Community Outreach), Archdiocese of Gulu
Period
2007–present
Keywords
connectivity, community networks, post-conflict recovery, ICT4D

Description

Northern Uganda's two-decade Lord's Resistance Army conflict displaced roughly 1.8 million people into camps; after the 2006 ceasefire, returning communities had almost no telecom infrastructure to rebuild livelihoods, access education or reach government and health services.
Founded in 2006 under the Catholic Archdiocese of Gulu, BOSCO Uganda (Battery Operated Systems for Community Outreach) deployed solar-powered PCs linked by long-range, unlicensed 2.4/5GHz WiFi (Ubiquiti and Mikrotik hardware) connecting schools, health centres, local government offices and community centres, with core partners Horizont3000, UNICEF and the University of Notre Dame.
By the mid-2020s the network comprised 54 ICT centres and 5 solar energy sites across districts including Gulu, Amuru, Kitgum, Pader, Lamwo, Adjumani, Yumbe and Arua, plus six refugee settlements (Bidibidi, Rhino Camp, Palorinya, Maaji, Nvempi/Invepi and Omugo II), with its longest single WiFi link spanning roughly 160-176km. Centres generate revenue through printing, photocopying and digital-skills training, and host Village Savings and Loans Associations to help cover running costs.
Independent write-ups (KICTANet, ICTworks) document the infrastructure and reach in detail, but no independent randomised or quasi-experimental evaluation of educational or economic outcomes was found; beneficiary and reach figures are self-reported by BOSCO and its partners and should be read as descriptive rather than rigorously verified.

Read the full analysis: https://www.boscouganda.com/

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful