evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Bristol Is Open — A City-Wide Smart City Testbed, and Its Wind-Down

United Kingdom · Bristol · See the United Kingdom profile · See the Bristol profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 98% 33/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Bristol City Council and the University of Bristol launched 'Bristol Is Open' in 2015, a city-wide programmable smart-city testbed. It won UK smart-city awards, but a 2016 review found weak business focus; the joint venture is now dormant.

£1 million
Reported Nokia sponsorship secured in turnaround (2016)
~£700,000
Working capital raised in turnaround (2016)
#1 Huawei/Navigant Smart Cities Index
UK smart city ranking (October 2017)
3 years
Duration as an independent joint-venture entity (2015-2018)
Bristol Is Open — A City-Wide Smart City Testbed, and Its Wind-Down

Details

Maturity
Discontinued
Promoter
Bristol City Council / University of Bristol
Period
2015–2020 (company now dormant)
Keywords
smart city testbed, digital infrastructure, IoT/5G R&D, urban experimentation

Context

Bristol Is Open (BiO) launched in April 2015 as a joint venture between Bristol City Council and the University of Bristol to build a city-wide 'programmable' digital testbed — combining fibre, Wi-Fi, a city-scale Internet-of-Things network and 5G trials — that researchers and companies could use to pilot smart-city technologies.

Activities

Researchers and companies used the testbed to pilot software-defined networking, IoT/big-data analytics and CCTV analytics, in projects including Big Clout and Replicate. Barely a year in, Bristol City Council commissioned Perform Green in April 2016 for a viability review, which found 'a lack of business focus, low levels of investment and an optimal organisational structure.' Perform Green's turnaround work included commercial audits, a new sponsorship model (including a reported £1 million sponsorship from Nokia) and roughly £700,000 in working capital.

Results

The turnaround stabilised operations enough that Bristol was ranked the UK's top smart city by the Huawei/Navigant Smart Cities Index in October 2017 and won a Smart City award at Mobile World Congress in March 2018.

Conclusions

The recovery did not last as an independent entity. Per Bristol City Council's own published policy page, after three years of operation the joint venture ended, with the council taking sole ownership of BiO to complete its remaining projects — and 'the company is now dormant.' Some functions were folded into the council's broader smart-city work (e.g. the Bristol Operations Centre) and academic activity continued via the University of Bristol's Bristol Digital Futures Institute, but BiO itself did not survive as a going concern — a cautionary counterpoint showing award wins and pilot activity are not proof of institutional durability.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M) — ~£700,000 working capital plus a reported £1 million Nokia sponsorship secured during the 2016 turnaround; original city-wide infrastructure build costs (fibre, IoT network, 5G trials) are not disclosed in the sources.
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years) — Launched April 2015 → viability review April 2016 → turnaround and sponsorship 2016-2017 → UK top smart city ranking October 2017 → Mobile World Congress award March 2018 → joint venture wound down after 3 years, council took sole ownership; company now dormant.
Staffing & skills
Joint venture governed jointly by Bristol City Council and the University of Bristol, Perform Green commissioned externally for the 2016 viability review and turnaround (commercial audits, new sponsorship model)

Conditions for success

  • Sustained sponsorship/investment beyond initial public funding (e.g. corporate sponsorship such as Nokia's)
  • A clear commercial/business focus, which the 2016 review found was originally lacking

Common failure modes

  • 2016 review found 'a lack of business focus, low levels of investment and an optimal organisational structure'
  • The joint venture dissolved after three years and the company is now dormant, despite award recognition and technical success

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 43

City of Cape Town Open Data Portal

South Africa

Cape Town's Open Data Portal, live since January 2015 and paired with free public-library access, publishes municipal datasets for reuse …