evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

California Healthy Soils Program

United States of America · Sacramento · See the United States of America profile · See the Sacramento profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 84% 33/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Since 2017, California's CDFA has issued $105M+ in grants for 1,500+ farm projects using compost, cover crops and reduced tillage. Modelled reductions total 1.1M tCO2e, though peer-reviewed reviews flag real uncertainty in soil-carbon measurement.

105+ million USD
Total grant funding awarded (2017-present)
1,500+
Incentive-grant projects funded
1.1+ million tCO2e
Estimated lifetime GHG reduction
12 million USD
January 2024 funding round (Jan 2024)
65 million USD
2024 Proposition 4 climate-bond allocation (2024)

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA)
Period
2017–present
Keywords
agriculture, soil carbon, climate mitigation, state grants

Context

California's Healthy Soils Program (HSP), run by the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) since 2017 and funded through California Climate Investments (cap-and-trade auction proceeds), issues competitive grants to farmers, ranchers, tribes and non-profits for practices intended to build soil carbon and cut on-farm emissions.

Objectives

Build soil carbon and reduce on-farm emissions via compost application, cover cropping, reduced or no tillage, and hedgerow planting.

Activities

Applicants estimate expected greenhouse-gas benefits using CDFA's COMET-Planner/COMET-Farm modelling tools as part of each grant application. A January 2024 round made roughly $12 million available, and California's 2024 Proposition 4 climate bond allocated a further $65 million to the program.

Results

HSP has awarded more than $105 million across over 1,500 incentive-grant projects, which CDFA estimates will deliver a combined lifetime reduction of more than 1.1 million tCO2e - equivalent, the agency says, to taking about 24,000 cars off the road for ten years.

Conclusions

A 2023 peer-reviewed review in Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems found significant uncertainty in soil-carbon quantification methods and only modest realistic mitigation potential from most soil-carbon practices at scale, and noted some incentivised practices (e.g. no-till) can increase nitrous-oxide emissions even as they raise soil carbon. Reviewers also flagged that direct greenhouse-gas monitoring is optional for some HSP project types, meaning the program's headline tonnage is a modelled projection rather than a verified measurement.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M) — $105M+ cumulative grants across 1,500+ projects since 2017, funded via cap-and-trade auction proceeds
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Running since 2017, ongoing with periodic funding rounds
Staffing & skills
California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) - programme administrator

Conditions for success

  • Cap-and-trade auction revenue (California Climate Investments) as a stable funding source
  • Standardised modelling tools (COMET-Planner/COMET-Farm) for grant applications
  • Continued legislative/bond funding (e.g. 2024 Proposition 4)

Common failure modes

  • 2023 peer-reviewed review found significant uncertainty in soil-carbon quantification methods and only modest realistic mitigation potential at scale
  • Some incentivised practices (e.g. no-till) can raise nitrous-oxide emissions even while raising soil carbon
  • Direct GHG monitoring is optional for some project types, so headline tonnage is a modelled projection, not a verified measurement

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Replication kit

Reusable artefacts from this practice — as published by their sources.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 47

Reinvest in Minnesota (RIM) Reserve Program

United States of America

Since 1986 Minnesota has paid landowners a one-time fee for easements retiring marginal cropland, wetlands and prairie. State agency BWSR …