Details
- Maturity
- Established
- Promoter
- California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA)
- Period
- 2017–present
- Keywords
- agriculture, soil carbon, climate mitigation, state grants
Context
California's Healthy Soils Program (HSP), run by the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) since 2017 and funded through California Climate Investments (cap-and-trade auction proceeds), issues competitive grants to farmers, ranchers, tribes and non-profits for practices intended to build soil carbon and cut on-farm emissions.
Objectives
Build soil carbon and reduce on-farm emissions via compost application, cover cropping, reduced or no tillage, and hedgerow planting.
Activities
Applicants estimate expected greenhouse-gas benefits using CDFA's COMET-Planner/COMET-Farm modelling tools as part of each grant application. A January 2024 round made roughly $12 million available, and California's 2024 Proposition 4 climate bond allocated a further $65 million to the program.
Results
HSP has awarded more than $105 million across over 1,500 incentive-grant projects, which CDFA estimates will deliver a combined lifetime reduction of more than 1.1 million tCO2e - equivalent, the agency says, to taking about 24,000 cars off the road for ten years.
Conclusions
A 2023 peer-reviewed review in Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems found significant uncertainty in soil-carbon quantification methods and only modest realistic mitigation potential from most soil-carbon practices at scale, and noted some incentivised practices (e.g. no-till) can increase nitrous-oxide emissions even as they raise soil carbon. Reviewers also flagged that direct greenhouse-gas monitoring is optional for some HSP project types, meaning the program's headline tonnage is a modelled projection rather than a verified measurement.
Implementation
- Indicative cost
- High (€500k–€5M) — $105M+ cumulative grants across 1,500+ projects since 2017, funded via cap-and-trade auction proceeds
- Time to results
- Long (> 3 years) — Running since 2017, ongoing with periodic funding rounds
- Staffing & skills
- California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) - programme administrator
Conditions for success
- Cap-and-trade auction revenue (California Climate Investments) as a stable funding source
- Standardised modelling tools (COMET-Planner/COMET-Farm) for grant applications
- Continued legislative/bond funding (e.g. 2024 Proposition 4)
Common failure modes
- 2023 peer-reviewed review found significant uncertainty in soil-carbon quantification methods and only modest realistic mitigation potential at scale
- Some incentivised practices (e.g. no-till) can raise nitrous-oxide emissions even while raising soil carbon
- Direct GHG monitoring is optional for some project types, so headline tonnage is a modelled projection, not a verified measurement
Commonly funded by
National / regional programmes
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Replication kit
Reusable artefacts from this practice — as published by their sources.
Do you run this practice?
Claim it —
verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Data sources
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.