evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Casablanca Finance City — Africa's Leading Financial Hub

Morocco · Casablanca · See the Morocco profile · See the Casablanca profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 76% 57/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Morocco's Casablanca Finance City grew to 200+ member companies since 2010 and topped the Global Financial Centres Index for Africa for years, but the EU put Morocco on its tax-haven grey list (2019-20) over CFC's tax regime before reforms secured its removal.

226 companies
Member companies (2024)
24 nationalities
Nationalities represented among members (2024)
80 countries
Countries where member companies operate (2024)
7000 jobs (upper estimate)
Direct jobs contributed
49 rank of 120 centres
GFCI global ranking (March 2026 (GFCI 39))
Casablanca Finance City — Africa's Leading Financial Hub

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Casablanca Finance City Authority (CFCA)
Period
2010–present
Keywords
financial services hub, business attraction, investment promotion

Context

Casablanca Finance City was established in December 2010 under Morocco's Law No. 44-10 and is governed by the Casablanca Finance City Authority (CFCA). Built on the site of the former Casablanca-Anfa Airport and redeveloped into a modern business district, it grants qualifying international financial and non-financial services companies a special 'CFC Status' designed to position Casablanca as a gateway between Europe, Africa and the Middle East.

Results

The hub surpassed its initial target of 100 member companies by 2015, grew to 150 companies across 46 countries by 2018, and reached 226 member companies representing 24 nationalities operating in 80 countries by 2024 — contributing, by various official counts, between roughly 5,500 and 7,000 direct jobs in the local market. The independent Global Financial Centres Index (GFCI) placed CFC 1st in Africa and 33rd globally as early as its April 2016 edition, a position held through most editions to 2024; it briefly slipped to 2nd in Africa by September 2025 before the March 2026 edition showed it reclaiming Africa's top spot, ranked 49th of 120 centres worldwide.

Conclusions

The original CFC tax regime — a five-year corporate tax exemption followed by a reduced 8.75% rate on export sales and foreign-source capital gains — was judged a harmful preferential regime by the OECD's Forum on Harmful Tax Practices, leading the EU to keep Morocco on its tax-haven grey list through 2019-2020. Morocco was only removed after reforming the regime, a reminder that part of CFC's company-attraction numbers reflected tax arbitrage rather than purely organic economic activity.

Implementation
Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M) — No specific public infrastructure cost disclosed; economic model relies on preferential tax status (originally a five-year exemption plus 8.75% reduced rate) rather than large direct public capital spend.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Established December 2010; surpassed 100-company target by 2015; reached 226 companies by 2024; GFCI top-Africa ranking held for most editions 2016-2026.
Staffing & skills
Governed by a dedicated state authority, the Casablanca Finance City Authority (CFCA)

Conditions for success

  • A distinct legal 'CFC Status' (Law No. 44-10) granting preferential tax and regulatory treatment to qualifying international firms
  • Strategic positioning as a gateway between Europe, Africa and the Middle East
  • Redevelopment of a large brownfield site (the former Casablanca-Anfa Airport) into a purpose-built business district

Common failure modes

  • The original preferential tax regime was judged harmful by the OECD and led to Morocco's EU tax-haven grey-listing (2019-2020) until reformed, indicating that headline company-attraction numbers partly reflected tax arbitrage rather than purely organic growth

Where it fits

Governance type
dedicated state authority with special legal/tax status
Scale
national gateway hub
Income level
lower-middle-income (Morocco)

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful