Gradescope — AI-assisted grading and feedback for higher education
United States of America
AI platform grouping similar student responses for batch grading; 3.2M students at 2,600+ universities. A peer-reviewed ACM 2017 study found …
India · New Delhi · See the India profile
India's CBSE is scaling On-Screen Marking with AI-based quality control for Class XII board exams from 2025-26: scripts are digitised, anonymised by barcode, and AI flags examiners marking unusually fast or inconsistently, while humans remain the final graders.
The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE), which oversees roughly 29,000 affiliated schools across India, is rolling out On-Screen Marking (OSM) for Class XII answer scripts. Papers are scanned at regional centres and assigned a unique barcode so the examiner never sees the student's identity; scripts are then displayed to human examiners on-screen, with an AI layer auto-tallying marks and monitoring examiner behaviour, flagging scripts marked unusually quickly or with inconsistent patterns for supervisory review. A dedicated digital-evaluation and AI centre was established in Dwarka, New Delhi, where mock evaluations were run ahead of the 2025-26 rollout, per CBSE circulars issued between February and May 2026.
In an internal CBSE pilot covering 250+ answer sheets, AI-supported scoring checks diverged from expert human graders by only 3-5 marks on average, and participating teachers reported saving over 8 hours per week previously spent on manual tallying and script logistics. During the 2024-25 session, CBSE separately used AI-based cross-checks comparing internal school-assessment marks against board-exam marks, identifying inconsistent internal assessment at a number of schools and issuing advisories to affiliated institutions.
The system does not autonomously grade descriptive answers — human examiners remain the assessors of record — and the pilot's quantitative results (marks variance, hours saved) come from CBSE and affiliated-school reporting rather than an independent peer-reviewed evaluation. This is best read as an early-stage, process-quality-focused deployment rather than a proven learning-outcome intervention.
Read the full analysis: https://www.cbse.gov.in/cbsenew/examination_circular.html
Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
United States of America
AI platform grouping similar student responses for batch grading; 3.2M students at 2,600+ universities. A peer-reviewed ACM 2017 study found …
United States of America
Widely deployed AI-writing detection — but documented false positives, bias against non-native English writers, and wrongful cheating accusations make it …
Australia
Instead of an unwinnable AI-detection arms race, Sydney redesigned assessment into two lanes — secure in-person assessment of core capability, …
United Kingdom
Free AI writing-feedback tool by Cambridge University Press & Assessment (Sept 2016); assigns CEFR A1–C2 levels to EFL essays and …
Open full copilot Grounded in cited practices — always check the sources.