evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Gradescope — AI-assisted grading and feedback for higher education

United States of America · Berkeley · See the United States of America profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 8% 73/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

AI platform grouping similar student responses for batch grading; 3.2M students at 2,600+ universities. A peer-reviewed ACM 2017 study found 67% of instructors save ≥30% grading time; a 2024 Indiana University case study linked adoption to lower DFW rates and higher grades.

67%
Instructors saving ≥30% grading time
79.7%
Users agreeing anonymous grading reduces bias
3.2M
Active students (2025) (2025)
2,600+
Institutions served (2025)
Gradescope — AI-assisted grading and feedback for higher education

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Gradescope
Period
2014–present
Keywords
higher education, assessment, ed-tech, AI

Context

Gradescope, launched commercially in 2014 from a UC Berkeley prototype, clusters visually similar handwritten student responses so instructors can apply one rubric decision to an entire group. Turnitin acquired it in 2018; it now covers typed, code and bubble-sheet assignments.

Results

A peer-reviewed ACM Learning @ Scale 2017 paper found 67% of surveyed instructors saved at least 30% of grading time, and 79.7% of users agreed anonymous grading reduced assessor bias. A 2024 Indiana University case study (Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology) documented lower DFW rates and higher average grades in a large lecture course after adoption, though the authors note concurrent instructional changes also contributed.

Conclusions

As of 2025 the platform serves 3.2 million students at 2,600+ institutions across 100+ countries. Data-privacy conditions changed under Turnitin ownership, drawing scrutiny from European data-protection advocates.

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Commonly funded by

Own resources / municipal budget

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful