evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

ChatGPT-3.5 as a Supplementary Skills Instructor Improves Dental Procedure Performance in a 187-Student RCT at Wuhan University

China · Wuhan · See the China profile

Top 59% 47/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

A one-week RCT with 187 Chinese dental undergraduates found ChatGPT-3.5 access alongside standard video instruction significantly improved procedural performance and cut eye-tracking-measured cognitive load, with the biggest gains for students with lower spatial ability.

Details

Promoter
Wuhan University, School & Hospital of Stomatology
Period
2024
Keywords
higher education, dental/medical training, clinical skills education

Description

Wuhan University's School & Hospital of Stomatology randomly assigned 187 third-year dental undergraduates to a one-week skills-training unit, either with standard video instruction alone (control) or with the same video instruction plus on-demand access to ChatGPT-3.5 as a supplementary instructor (intervention).
On a blinded practical assessment, the ChatGPT group scored significantly higher than the control group (mean 73.12 vs 65.54, t=4.569, p<.001). Eye-tracking-derived pupil-diameter measures showed significantly lower cognitive load in the ChatGPT group (mean 0.137 vs 0.312, p<.001). Students with low spatial ability benefited most (mean 70.20 vs 55.41, p<.001), and self-reported self-efficacy (p=.04) and learning motivation (p=.02) both favoured the ChatGPT group.
The trial ran for one week at a single university using an untuned, general-purpose chatbot rather than a purpose-built or institutionally vetted AI tutor; the published study does not report on data-governance measures for student use of a third-party, US-hosted chatbot, nor does it evaluate any teacher-facing component.

Read the full analysis: https://www.jmir.org/2025/1/e68538

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful