evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice

Costa Rica's Red Nacional de Cuido y Desarrollo Infantil (REDCUDI) — A Stalling Childcare Network for Working Mothers

Costa Rica · San José · See the Costa Rica profile

Costa Rica's REDCUDI childcare network aims to free mothers for paid work, but 2024 data show it reaches only 8.8% of its target population, with beneficiary numbers falling 12% (2023) and 7% (2024) while its per-child subsidy has been frozen for seven years.

Costa Rica's Red Nacional de Cuido y Desarrollo Infantil (REDCUDI) — A Stalling Childcare Network for Working Mothers

Details

Promoter
Instituto Mixto de Ayuda Social (IMAS) — REDCUDI Secretaría Técnica
Period
2010–present (established 2010; coverage decline documented 2023–2024)
Keywords
childcare network, care economy, women's labour force participation, social protection, early childhood development

Description

Established in 2010 and coordinated by the Instituto Mixto de Ayuda Social (IMAS), Costa Rica's Red Nacional de Cuido y Desarrollo Infantil (REDCUDI) funds childcare and early-development centres for children in poverty and vulnerability, explicitly to enable mothers' and fathers' "labour and educational insertion" — the network was, for over a decade, cited regionally (including by ECLAC/CEPAL) as a reference model for linking childcare to women's economic participation.
Independent evidence increasingly shows a programme under strain. According to the 2024 Estado de la Nación report, REDCUDI reaches only about 8.8% of its target population of children in poverty; beneficiary numbers fell 12% in 2023 and a further 7% in 2024, to 29,582 people served, and the government's own goal of adding 4,000 places in 2024 was not met, a shortfall confirmed by Costa Rica's Ombudsman (Defensoría de los Habitantes). The monthly subsidy IMAS pays per child (¢131,000) has been frozen for seven consecutive years, even though a UNICEF Costa Rica costing study (August 2024) put the actually-required amount at ¢220,000.
REDCUDI illustrates both the promise and the fragility of care-economy infrastructure: its gender rationale (freeing caregivers, mostly mothers, for employment) is well-established and was innovative at launch, but sustained underfunding has produced a shrinking, not growing, service — a cautionary case for other countries scaling similar networks without indexing subsidies to real costs.

Read the full analysis: https://igualdad.cepal.org/es/repository-of-policies-and-strategies/red-nacional-de-cuido-y-desarrollo-infantil-redcudi

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful