evidoria

What works in Costa Rica

All catalogues

25
evaluated practices
59/100
average quality score
4%
strong evidence, of 23 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Costa Rica

Drawn from: OTAI Audit of 150 Public Platforms — Evidence Base for Costa Rica's Directriz 051-MTSS-MICITT · FONATEL Hogares Conectados – Subsidised Internet and Device Programme for Households in Poverty (Costa Rica) · Costa Rica Payments for Environmental Services (PSA / FONAFIFO) · Costa Rica's Gender Parity Electoral Code — 49% Women in Legislature (2009–2026) · CLEO — Costa Rica's AI Assistant for Purging Surgical Waiting Lists · ChatbotPJ — Costa Rica's Judicial-Branch AI Assistant for Case and Service Queries · CIAT e-IAD — Costa Rica’s AI anomaly detector for e-invoice fraud · CECI — Costa Rica's Community Smart Centres: A National Telecentre Network and Its Sustainability Lessons

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +33 pts 80 here · 47 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +22 pts 60 here · 38 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +12 pts 60 here · 48 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value +10 pts 67 here · 57 average

Governance, certification & transferability +9 pts 73 here · 64 average

Weaknesses

Inclusiveness / equity -10 pts 33 here · 43 average

Evaluated outcomes -11 pts 67 here · 78 average

Innovation level -13 pts 49 here · 62 average

Achievement / evidence -20 pts 67 here · 87 average

Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average

Effectiveness -33 pts 33 here · 66 average

Impact on gender equality -36 pts 33 here · 70 average

Curator validation -40 pts 33 here · 73 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Transparency, ethics & data protection
80 · 47
Documented learning
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Teacher capability & pedagogy
60 · 38
Transparency, fairness & accountability
67 · 54
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
60 · 48
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Evidence of impact / measured public value
67 · 57
Governance, certification & transferability
73 · 64
Transferability / demonstrated replication
67 · 60
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
53 · 48
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
78 · 74
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
7 · 6
Scalability beyond pilot
62 · 62
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
27 · 27
Equity & inclusion
47 · 50
Evidence of learning impact
20 · 26
Sustainability (ongoing)
70 · 78
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 43
Evaluated outcomes
67 · 78
Innovation level
49 · 62
Achievement / evidence
67 · 87
Efficiency
0 · 32
Effectiveness
33 · 66
Impact on gender equality
33 · 70
Curator validation
33 · 73

Coloured bar: Costa Rica. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

OTAI Audit of 150 Public Platforms — Evidence Base for Costa Rica's Directriz 051-MTSS-MICITT · 96

FONATEL Hogares Conectados – Subsidised Internet and Device Programme for Households in Poverty (Costa Rica) · 88

Costa Rica Payments for Environmental Services (PSA / FONAFIFO) · 87

Costa Rica's Gender Parity Electoral Code — 49% Women in Legislature (2009–2026) · 78

CLEO — Costa Rica's AI Assistant for Purging Surgical Waiting Lists · 73

ChatbotPJ — Costa Rica's Judicial-Branch AI Assistant for Case and Service Queries · 73

CIAT e-IAD — Costa Rica’s AI anomaly detector for e-invoice fraud · 73

CECI — Costa Rica's Community Smart Centres: A National Telecentre Network and Its Sustainability Lessons · 68

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Costa Rica concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more