evidoria

What works in Costa Rica

All catalogues

20
evaluated practices
63/100
average quality score
6%
strong evidence, of 17 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Costa Rica

Drawn from: OTAI Audit of 150 Public Platforms — Evidence Base for Costa Rica's Directriz 051-MTSS-MICITT · FONATEL Hogares Conectados – Subsidised Internet and Device Programme for Households in Poverty (Costa Rica) · Costa Rica Payments for Environmental Services (PSA / FONAFIFO) · Costa Rica's Gender Parity Electoral Code — 49% Women in Legislature (2009–2026) · CLEO — Costa Rica's AI Assistant for Purging Surgical Waiting Lists · ChatbotPJ — Costa Rica's Judicial-Branch AI Assistant for Case and Service Queries · CIAT e-IAD — Costa Rica’s AI anomaly detector for e-invoice fraud · Joining Multinational Supply Chains — Costa Rica's Evidence-Based Supplier-Linkage Push

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +32 pts 80 here · 48 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +28 pts 78 here · 50 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +23 pts 60 here · 37 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +20 pts 73 here · 54 average

Evaluated outcomes +15 pts 100 here · 85 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value +12 pts 71 here · 59 average

Governance, certification & transferability +10 pts 75 here · 64 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Inclusiveness / equity -9 pts 33 here · 42 average

Innovation level -12 pts 51 here · 63 average

Curator validation -24 pts 50 here · 74 average

Effectiveness -27 pts 50 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality -30 pts 50 here · 80 average

Achievement / evidence -41 pts 50 here · 91 average

Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 45
Transparency, ethics & data protection
80 · 48
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
78 · 50
Documented learning
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Teacher capability & pedagogy
60 · 37
Transparency, fairness & accountability
73 · 54
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 85
Evidence of impact / measured public value
71 · 59
Governance, certification & transferability
75 · 64
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Transferability / demonstrated replication
67 · 60
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
11 · 7
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 31
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
78 · 76
Scalability beyond pilot
64 · 64
Sustainability (ongoing)
76 · 78
Equity & inclusion
47 · 52
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
44 · 51
Evidence of learning impact
20 · 28
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 42
Innovation level
51 · 63
Curator validation
50 · 74
Effectiveness
50 · 77
Impact on gender equality
50 · 80
Achievement / evidence
50 · 91
Efficiency
0 · 44

Coloured bar: Costa Rica. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

OTAI Audit of 150 Public Platforms — Evidence Base for Costa Rica's Directriz 051-MTSS-MICITT · 96

FONATEL Hogares Conectados – Subsidised Internet and Device Programme for Households in Poverty (Costa Rica) · 88

Costa Rica Payments for Environmental Services (PSA / FONAFIFO) · 87

Costa Rica's Gender Parity Electoral Code — 49% Women in Legislature (2009–2026) · 78

CLEO — Costa Rica's AI Assistant for Purging Surgical Waiting Lists · 73

ChatbotPJ — Costa Rica's Judicial-Branch AI Assistant for Case and Service Queries · 73

CIAT e-IAD — Costa Rica’s AI anomaly detector for e-invoice fraud · 73

Joining Multinational Supply Chains — Costa Rica's Evidence-Based Supplier-Linkage Push · 62

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Costa Rica concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more