evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice

Croatia's Forest Public Benefit Function Fee (Naknada za Općekorisne Funkcije Šuma)

Croatia · Zagreb · See the Croatia profile

Since 1983, Croatian firms have paid a statutory levy on revenue into a fund for karst-forest restoration, fire infrastructure and demining; by 2016 it had extended firefighting passages from 58 km to over 7,000 km and demined 52,631 ha, though the rate has been repeatedly cut.

58 km to 7,065.61 km km
Firefighting-access forest passages (pre-fee to end of 2016)
52,631 hectares
Mined forest demined (since post-war period, as of 2015)
€63.88 million (2010) to €24.66 million (2015) €
Fee revenue
0.07% (1983) to 0.015% (2024) % of revenue
Fee rate on company revenue
52.5 € million
Investment in demining (2005-2015)

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Republic of Croatia (previously Hrvatske šume)
Period
1983-present
Keywords
statutory forest levy, karst forest restoration, wildfire infrastructure, demining

Context

Croatia's Forest Public Benefit Function Fee (Naknada za Općekorisne Funkcije Šuma, OKFŠ) is a statutory levy, first introduced in the 1983 Yugoslav Forest Act and re-adopted in Croatia's own 1990 Forest Act, paid annually by companies and self-employed people above a revenue threshold. Revenue is ring-fenced for karst-forest management: about 1.14 million of Croatia's 2.68 million hectares of forest (43%) sit on karst terrain, largely in Istria, Lika and Dalmatia, where trees are too small and scattered for commercial timber income, leaving fire prevention, erosion control and biodiversity as the forests' main value.

Activities

A 2016 case study for the European Commission's DG Environment documents how the fund is spent: in 2015, roughly 80% went to forest restoration, 10% to demining, 5% to firefighting infrastructure and 5% to forestry science.

Results

Before the fee existed, Croatian karst had only 58 km of forest passages usable for firefighting access; by the end of 2016 this had grown to 7,065.61 km of forest-road-linked passages plus 984.42 km of dedicated forest roads and 184 monitoring posts. Since the post-war period, the fund financed demining of 52,631 hectares of mined forest (out of 234,000 ha originally affected), with €52.5 million invested from the fee between 2005 and 2015 alone. However, the fee rate has fallen repeatedly under business-lobby pressure — from 0.07% of company revenue at introduction to 0.015% since April 2024 — and revenue fell accordingly, from €63.88 million in 2010 to €24.66 million in 2015.

Conclusions

The case study is candid about limits: environmental effectiveness is 'significant but not measurable' beyond the firebreak and demining figures, public opinion of the fee is poor (it is widely criticised in Croatia as a 'parafiscal tax'), and its funding base has been repeatedly eroded by rate cuts driven by industry lobbying rather than evidence of reduced need.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M) — A national statutory levy that generated tens of millions of euros annually (peaking near €64 million in 2010) places this in the high cost band, even after rate cuts reduced it to about €25 million by 2015.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — The levy has run continuously since 1983, over four decades — a long timeline band.
Staffing & skills
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Republic of Croatia (previously Hrvatske šume)

Conditions for success

  • statutory, ring-fenced levy mechanism independent of annual budget negotiation
  • committee-based spending oversight documented in an external EC case study

Common failure modes

  • repeated politically-driven rate cuts (0.07% to 0.015%) have nearly halved real revenue
  • poor public opinion — widely criticised in Croatia as a 'parafiscal tax'
  • the programme's own case study says broader environmental effectiveness is 'significant but not measurable'

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful