Costa Rica Payments for Environmental Services (PSA / FONAFIFO)
Costa Rica
Costa Rica's national PES, created by the 1996 Forest Law, has paid landowners US$565M to conserve 1.15M+ hectares for carbon, …
Croatia · Zagreb · See the Croatia profile
Since 1983, Croatian firms have paid a statutory levy on revenue into a fund for karst-forest restoration, fire infrastructure and demining; by 2016 it had extended firefighting passages from 58 km to over 7,000 km and demined 52,631 ha, though the rate has been repeatedly cut.
Croatia's Forest Public Benefit Function Fee (Naknada za Općekorisne Funkcije Šuma, OKFŠ) is a statutory levy, first introduced in the 1983 Yugoslav Forest Act and re-adopted in Croatia's own 1990 Forest Act, paid annually by companies and self-employed people above a revenue threshold. Revenue is ring-fenced for karst-forest management: about 1.14 million of Croatia's 2.68 million hectares of forest (43%) sit on karst terrain, largely in Istria, Lika and Dalmatia, where trees are too small and scattered for commercial timber income, leaving fire prevention, erosion control and biodiversity as the forests' main value.
A 2016 case study for the European Commission's DG Environment documents how the fund is spent: in 2015, roughly 80% went to forest restoration, 10% to demining, 5% to firefighting infrastructure and 5% to forestry science.
Before the fee existed, Croatian karst had only 58 km of forest passages usable for firefighting access; by the end of 2016 this had grown to 7,065.61 km of forest-road-linked passages plus 984.42 km of dedicated forest roads and 184 monitoring posts. Since the post-war period, the fund financed demining of 52,631 hectares of mined forest (out of 234,000 ha originally affected), with €52.5 million invested from the fee between 2005 and 2015 alone. However, the fee rate has fallen repeatedly under business-lobby pressure — from 0.07% of company revenue at introduction to 0.015% since April 2024 — and revenue fell accordingly, from €63.88 million in 2010 to €24.66 million in 2015.
The case study is candid about limits: environmental effectiveness is 'significant but not measurable' beyond the firebreak and demining figures, public opinion of the fee is poor (it is widely criticised in Croatia as a 'parafiscal tax'), and its funding base has been repeatedly eroded by rate cuts driven by industry lobbying rather than evidence of reduced need.
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
Costa Rica
Costa Rica's national PES, created by the 1996 Forest Law, has paid landowners US$565M to conserve 1.15M+ hectares for carbon, …
Japan
Since 2019, Japan distributes ¥40–62 billion/year to municipalities and prefectures for managing private plantation forests; from April 2024 funded by …
Argentina
Argentina's 2007 Native Forest Law mandates 0.3% of the federal budget as direct payments to landowners and communities conserving Category …
Papua New Guinea
PNG's REDD+ programme verified 17M tCO₂e of avoided deforestation (2014–2016), earning USD 63.4M in GCF results-based payments (July 2025). Covers …
Open full copilot Grounded in cited practices — always check the sources.