evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

data.gov.ge — Georgia's Open Data Portal and the Gap Between Launch and Uptake

Georgia · Tbilisi · See the Georgia profile · See the Tbilisi profile

Top 98% 33/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Georgia's Ministry of Justice launched data.gov.ge in 2015 under its Open Government Partnership plan. An independent 2018 review found just 161 databases live — a documented case of a well-designed portal held back by voluntary, unenforced publishing rules.

Details

Promoter
LEPL Data Exchange Agency / Digital Governance Agency, Ministry of Justice of Georgia
Period
2015–2018 (assessment period; portal still operating)
Keywords
digital government, open data, transparency, public sector reform

Description

In 2015, as part of its Open Government Partnership Action Plan, Georgia's Ministry of Justice — through its LEPL Data Exchange Agency, now the Digital Governance Agency — launched a national open data portal, www.data.gov.ge, meant to let businesses, NGOs and citizens use government data freely and build services on top of it.

An independent 2018 assessment by the Institute for Development of Freedom of Information (IDFI), published via K-Monitor, found the portal held only 161 databases as of April 2018 — concentrated in finance, education and science, and public governance — which the report called 'a considerably low number.' On the 2016 Open Data Barometer, Georgia scored a relatively strong 0.70 (16th globally) on the general right-to-information dimension, but a much weaker 0.51 (36th globally, 4th regionally) specifically on publishing laws and government data — a gap between legal openness and what actually got published.

IDFI's interviews with Data Exchange Agency staff identified the root cause honestly: no law obliges public institutions to publish on the portal, so participation depends entirely on each institution's goodwill, and most disclosed data stays in scanned PDFs rather than open formats. Partly to fill that gap, IDFI itself built and still runs a separate civil-society portal, OpenData.ge, populated from its own freedom-of-information requests. Georgia's case is a genuinely useful cautionary example: a well-intentioned national portal whose reach was capped by the absence of a legal mandate, not by technology.

Read the full analysis: https://data.gov.ge

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful