California Conservation and Mitigation Banking Program (USA)
United States of America
Since California's first conservation bank in 1995, CDFW has approved 97 banks covering about 73,948 acres (2024), generating 1,406.9 new …
South Korea · Seoul · See the South Korea profile
Since 2001 South Korea has charged developers a per-square-metre fee for ecosystem damage, funding 277 restoration projects by 2022 — though a 2024 academic review found scant evidence assessing whether restored sites actually recovered biodiversity.
Under South Korea's Natural Environment Conservation Act, developers whose projects damage a threshold area of natural ecosystems must pay an Ecosystem Conservation Cooperation Charge into a restoration fund administered by the Ministry of Environment. The charge, introduced in 2001, is calculated by multiplying the destroyed area by a per-square-metre rate (250 KRW/m2 at introduction, since raised to 300 KRW/m2) and a regional ecological coefficient, capped at 5 billion KRW per project.
Revenue funds "Ecosystem Conservation Charge Return Projects" (ECCRP) that restore damaged habitats, typically prioritising sites near existing source populations of target species. Guidelines revised in 2010 pushed project designers to specify target species explicitly; by the study period, 78.3% of projects did so, spanning 157 distinct species including 36 endangered ones, with birds, amphibians and insects as the main focus.
Between 2003 and 2022, 277 ECCRP restoration projects were completed nationwide, rising from around 3 per year at the outset to roughly 30 per year by 2022. Gyeonggi province led with 67 projects (24.2% of the total) and the Han River Basin Environmental Office alone administered 105 (37.9%); 83 projects (30%) took place in wetlands, 69 (24.9%) in urban areas and 47 (17%) in forestry land.
Independent academic review is more cautious than the programme's scale suggests. A 2024 peer-reviewed study (Sustainability, MDPI) found "a substantial lack of academic research assessing outcomes" and called for decade-long post-restoration monitoring. A separate valuation study found the statutory charge rate significantly undervalues real ecosystem-service worth (estimated at roughly 1,300-3,500 KRW/m2 per year), suggesting the fee charged to developers may be too low to fully offset the biodiversity damage it is meant to compensate.
Read the full analysis: https://www.koreascience.or.kr/article/JAKO201410051648624.page
Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
United States of America
Since California's first conservation bank in 1995, CDFW has approved 97 banks covering about 73,948 acres (2024), generating 1,406.9 new …
Colombia
Colombia's first Habitat Bank to issue tradeable Voluntary Biodiversity Credits protects 340 ha of Andean cloud forest in Támesis, Antioquia; …
United States of America
Largest statutory wetland offset market: 1,800+ mitigation banks in RIBITS (2013), restoring aquatic habitats across the US under CWA Section …
United Kingdom
Since February 2024, most development in England must deliver a measurable 10% biodiversity net gain in standardised biodiversity units — …
Open full copilot Grounded in cited practices — always check the sources.