evidoria

What works in South Korea

All catalogues

62
evaluated practices
61/100
average quality score
2%
strong evidence, of 46 assessed
4
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for South Korea

South Korea has implemented a comprehensive framework for digital accessibility and inclusion across multiple sectors. The Nationwide Accessible Kiosk Mandate requires voice guidance, braille, and adjustable-height features by January 2026, though a 2024–2025 survey found 30% of 540 people with disabilities still reported difficulty using kiosks, with 44.8% of 277 kiosk users preferring staff-assisted transactions. Web accessibility is enforced through the KWCAG Web Accessibility Mandate mandating Level AA compliance for all government websites, and Korea's Web Accessibility Quality Certification reports over 17,500 certified sites; however, the government's own benchmark shows average compliance scores plateaued near 61/100 since 2020 despite rising certifications. The Digital Baeumteo programme has trained 793,000 people across 1,000+ community centres as of 2022, targeting older adults (56% of trainees), people with disabilities, and multicultural families.

Drawn from: Nationwide Accessible Kiosk Mandate · Korea's Web Accessibility Quality Certification — A Digital Inclusion Act Cert Mark Backed by Three Government Bodies · Digital Baeumteo – National Digital Competence Training Network · KWCAG Web Accessibility Mandate & WA Certification · South Korea's National Election Commission — AI Deepfake Detection and Enforcement Ahead of the 2024 Elections · Korea dBrain+ — AI-enhanced national public financial management system for fiscal risk and treasury forecasting · South Korea's Public-Sector Gender Employment Disclosure System · Daedeok Innopolis — South Korea's R&D Commercialisation Cluster

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +41 pts 86 here · 45 average

Evaluated outcomes +15 pts 100 here · 85 average

Scalability beyond pilot +12 pts 76 here · 64 average

Documented learning +12 pts 86 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +10 pts 86 here · 76 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +9 pts 59 here · 50 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Governance, capability & sustainability +9 pts 73 here · 64 average

Weaknesses

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -10 pts 41 here · 51 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -12 pts 18 here · 31 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -15 pts 22 here · 37 average

Inclusiveness / equity -19 pts 24 here · 42 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -20 pts 28 here · 48 average

Equity & inclusion -24 pts 28 here · 52 average

Effectiveness -27 pts 50 here · 77 average

Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
86 · 45
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 85
Scalability beyond pilot
76 · 64
Documented learning
86 · 74
Demonstrated reach
86 · 76
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
59 · 50
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Governance, capability & sustainability
73 · 64
Evidence of impact / measured public value
67 · 59
Transparency, fairness & accountability
59 · 54
Innovation level
68 · 63
Sustainability (ongoing)
83 · 78
Impact on gender equality
83 · 80
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
76 · 76
Evidence of learning impact
28 · 28
Transferability / demonstrated replication
59 · 60
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Curator validation
67 · 74
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
41 · 51
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
18 · 31
Teacher capability & pedagogy
22 · 37
Inclusiveness / equity
24 · 42
Transparency, ethics & data protection
28 · 48
Equity & inclusion
28 · 52
Effectiveness
50 · 77
Efficiency
0 · 44

Coloured bar: South Korea. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

SK Telecom's AI Care — Voice-Activated Emergency Monitoring for Seniors Living Alone · 96

Nationwide Accessible Kiosk Mandate · 92

Korea's Web Accessibility Quality Certification — A Digital Inclusion Act Cert Mark Backed by Three Government Bodies · 92

Digital Baeumteo – National Digital Competence Training Network · 92

KWCAG Web Accessibility Mandate & WA Certification · 88

South Korea's National Election Commission — AI Deepfake Detection and Enforcement Ahead of the 2024 Elections · 87

Korea dBrain+ — AI-enhanced national public financial management system for fiscal risk and treasury forecasting · 87

Mandatory Annual Workplace Sexual-Harassment Prevention Education — South Korea · 85

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in South Korea concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Bogotá's Care Blocks (Manzanas del Cuidado) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more