evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Forest Foresight — AI Radar-Based Deforestation Prediction Protecting Gabon's Rainforest

Gabon · Libreville · See the Gabon profile · See the Libreville profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 76% 47/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

WWF and Wageningen University's Forest Foresight uses Sentinel-1 radar and ML to flag illegal-logging and mining risk months ahead. Gabonese rangers acted on an alert to halt an illegal gold-mining operation, saving about 30 hectares of forest and leading to arrests.

30 hectares
Forest saved in documented gold-mining intervention
34 actions
Deforestation-prevention actions across Gabon and Kalimantan pilots (six months)
6 months (up to)
Prediction lead time before illegal clearing
Forest Foresight — AI Radar-Based Deforestation Prediction Protecting Gabon's Rainforest

Details

Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
WWF and Wageningen University & Research, with Gabon's Ministry of Water and Forest Affairs
Period
2022–present (pilot, scaling to 2027)
Keywords
environment, conservation, satellite monitoring, forestry, compliance & enforcement

Context

Forest Foresight combines Sentinel-1 radar imagery (via the RADD system) with a machine-learning model trained on patterns that typically precede illegal logging, mining and agricultural clearing, flagging high-risk forest areas up to six months before clearing happens. In Gabon it is jointly run by WWF, Wageningen University & Research and Gabon's Ministry of Water and Forest Affairs, with Cameroon's MINFOF as a partner in the wider Congo Basin pilot; the initiative was presented at COP28 in 2023.

Objectives

The tool aims to give rangers and authorities an early warning window to intervene before illegal clearing occurs, rather than only detecting it after the fact, and ultimately to extend predictive monitoring to 15 landscapes across 12 countries by 2027.

Activities

Radar and ML-based alerts are generated for at-risk forest areas and passed to park rangers and authorities; the approach is piloted concurrently in Gabon, Kalimantan (Indonesia) and Suriname.

Results

In one documented case, an alert let Gabonese rangers detect and stop an illegal gold-mining operation, saving an estimated 30 hectares of forest and leading to arrests. Across the Gabon and Kalimantan pilots combined, partners report alerts led to 34 deforestation-prevention actions within a six-month period.

Conclusions

The evidence comes directly from the implementing partners rather than an independent evaluation, and no published accuracy or false-positive rate exists for the prediction model; the division of operational responsibility between the Gabonese government and the NGO/university partners is also not clearly documented, so this is best read as a promising, real, but still NGO-anchored pilot.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — No budget figures are published; classified as medium cost based on the scale of a multi-country satellite-ML monitoring partnership involving two research/NGO bodies and government ministries, presented internationally at COP28.
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years) — Piloted since 2022 with a stated roadmap to scale to 15 landscapes across 12 countries by 2027, indicating a multi-year programme rather than a short pilot cycle.
Staffing & skills
WWF, Wageningen University & Research, Gabon's Ministry of Water and Forest Affairs, Cameroon's Ministry of Forests and Wildlife (MINFOF), partner for the wider Congo Basin pilot

Conditions for success

  • Access to Sentinel-1 radar imagery and the RADD deforestation-detection system
  • Rangers and authorities able to act on alerts before clearing occurs
  • Ongoing government partnership for on-the-ground enforcement

Common failure modes

  • No published accuracy or false-positive rate for the prediction model
  • Operational responsibility between government and NGO/university partners not clearly documented

Commonly funded by

Philanthropic / foundation funding

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful