evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Galápagos Debt-for-Nature Swap — Ecuador's $1.6bn Sovereign Bond Conversion for Marine Conservation

Ecuador · Puerto Ayora · See the Ecuador profile

Top 81% 33/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

In May 2023 Ecuador closed the world's largest debt-for-nature swap, repurchasing $1.6bn of bonds to redirect roughly $450m over 18 years into Galápagos Marine and Hermandad Reserve conservation; independent 2025 analysis found the deal cut Ecuador's debt by only about 3%.

Galápagos Debt-for-Nature Swap — Ecuador's $1.6bn Sovereign Bond Conversion for Marine Conservation

Details

Promoter
Government of Ecuador, with the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), US International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) and Credit Suisse
Period
2023–2041
Keywords
sovereign debt conversion, marine conservation finance, blue bond, fisheries governance

Description

On 9 May 2023, Ecuador completed what was then the world's largest debt-for-nature conversion: the government repurchased USD 1.6 billion of its sovereign bonds at roughly 40 cents on the dollar, financed through a USD 656 million loan structured with support from the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) and the US International Development Finance Corporation (DFC), with insurance from the DFC and Credit Suisse as arranger.
The transaction is projected to save Ecuador about USD 1.1 billion in debt service over 17 years and to channel roughly USD 450 million into marine conservation over 18 years, funding management of the Galápagos National Park, the Galápagos Marine Reserve and the newly created Hermandad Marine Reserve — together spanning about 198,000 km² of ocean — plus an endowment projected to reach over USD 227 million by 2041, yielding roughly USD 12 million a year in perpetuity.
Independent scrutiny has tempered the headline framing: a 2025 Debt Justice analysis of four comparable swaps (Barbados, Belize, Gabon and Ecuador) found they reduced sovereign debt levels by an average of only about 3%, and advocacy groups including the Coalition for Fair Fisheries Arrangements have raised concerns that similar deals can shift management of strategic marine areas with limited consultation of local fishing communities — a governance caveat worth weighing against the conservation funding secured.

Read the full analysis: https://www.debtfornature.org/case-studies-blog/galapagos

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful