evidoria

What works in Ecuador

All catalogues

34
evaluated practices
50/100
average quality score
7%
strong evidence, of 29 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Ecuador

Drawn from: Ecuador's 'Paridad y Alternancia' Electoral Reform — Mandatory 50/50 Alternating Gender Parity in All Candidate Lists (2020) · Banco Pichincha's Co-Designed Accessible Mobile Banking — Blind Customers Guiding App Development in Ecuador · Red de Infocentros Comunitarios – Ecuador's National Rural Community Digital Network · GeoCitizen — Participatory GIS Land-Use Planning for Quito's Ilaló Mountain · Bájale al Acoso — Free SMS Harassment Reporting on Quito's Public Transport · AEI — Ecuador's Public-Private-Academic Alliance for Entrepreneurship and Innovation · Ecuador's WCAG 2.0 AA Web-Accessibility Mandate — a Binding Law With Near-Zero Measured Compliance · SCE's AI Code of Ethics and AI Lab — Ecuador's First Public-Sector AI Governance Framework

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Achievement / evidence +13 pts 100 here · 87 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +13 pts 61 here · 48 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Weaknesses

Innovation level -8 pts 53 here · 62 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -9 pts 18 here · 27 average

Demonstrated reach -9 pts 67 here · 76 average

Scalability beyond pilot -12 pts 50 here · 62 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -14 pts 60 here · 74 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -15 pts 42 here · 57 average

Effectiveness -16 pts 50 here · 66 average

Equity & inclusion -16 pts 33 here · 50 average

Curator validation -23 pts 50 here · 73 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -25 pts 13 here · 38 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Documented learning
100 · 74
Achievement / evidence
100 · 87
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
61 · 48
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 26
Impact on gender equality
75 · 70
Inclusiveness / equity
47 · 43
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 64
Sustainability (ongoing)
81 · 78
Transferability / replicability
60 · 60
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
46 · 48
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
3 · 6
Evaluated outcomes
75 · 78
Transparency, fairness & accountability
50 · 54
Efficiency
25 · 32
Transparency, ethics & data protection
40 · 47
Innovation level
53 · 62
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
18 · 27
Demonstrated reach
67 · 76
Scalability beyond pilot
50 · 62
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
60 · 74
Evidence of impact / measured public value
42 · 57
Effectiveness
50 · 66
Equity & inclusion
33 · 50
Curator validation
50 · 73
Teacher capability & pedagogy
13 · 38

Coloured bar: Ecuador. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Ecuador's 'Paridad y Alternancia' Electoral Reform — Mandatory 50/50 Alternating Gender Parity in All Candidate Lists (2020) · 96

Banco Pichincha's Co-Designed Accessible Mobile Banking — Blind Customers Guiding App Development in Ecuador · 92

Red de Infocentros Comunitarios – Ecuador's National Rural Community Digital Network · 92

GeoCitizen — Participatory GIS Land-Use Planning for Quito's Ilaló Mountain · 86

Bájale al Acoso — Free SMS Harassment Reporting on Quito's Public Transport · 78

AEI — Ecuador's Public-Private-Academic Alliance for Entrepreneurship and Innovation · 71

Ecuador's WCAG 2.0 AA Web-Accessibility Mandate — a Binding Law With Near-Zero Measured Compliance · 68

SCE's AI Code of Ethics and AI Lab — Ecuador's First Public-Sector AI Governance Framework · 67

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Ecuador concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more