What works in Ecuador
All catalogues
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for Ecuador
Ecuador has made significant progress on political gender parity and digital inclusion, though with uneven results. Ecuador's 2020 electoral reform mandated 50/50 alternating gender parity in candidate lists, raising women's representation in the National Assembly from ~30% to 39.4% in 2021 and 43.1% in 2023, while MINTEL operates a nationwide network of 888 community infocentres and 25 megainfocentros serving ~5.4 million beneficiaries with free internet and ICT training, with 80% located in rural areas. At the same time, Ecuador adopted a binding WCAG 2.0 AA web-accessibility standard in 2014, yet a 2017 audit found zero compliance among 44 university websites evaluated, averaging 5.0/10 with 8,970 accessibility errors, illustrating gaps between policy design and implementation.
Drawn from: Ecuador's 'Paridad y Alternancia' Electoral Reform — Mandatory 50/50 Alternating Gender Parity in All Candidate Lists (2020) · Banco Pichincha's Co-Designed Accessible Mobile Banking — Blind Customers Guiding App Development in Ecuador · Red de Infocentros Comunitarios – Ecuador's National Rural Community Digital Network · GeoCitizen — Participatory GIS Land-Use Planning for Quito's Ilaló Mountain · Ecuador's WCAG 2.0 AA Web-Accessibility Mandate — a Binding Law With Near-Zero Measured Compliance · SCE's AI Code of Ethics and AI Lab — Ecuador's First Public-Sector AI Governance Framework · SEDIP — Ecuador's Innovatrics ABIS Unifying Passport, Cédula and Social-Service Access · SENESCYT–World Bank ALEKS Math-Remediation RCT — National Digital Personalized Learning for Ecuador's First-Year College Students
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Efficiency +56 pts 100 here · 44 average
Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average
Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average
Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average
Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average
Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +16 pts 67 here · 50 average
Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average
Governance, certification & transferability +13 pts 78 here · 64 average
Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average
Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +8 pts 58 here · 50 average
Weaknesses
Demonstrated reach -9 pts 67 here · 76 average
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -10 pts 21 here · 31 average
Innovation level -12 pts 51 here · 63 average
Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 48 average
Scalability beyond pilot -17 pts 47 here · 64 average
Evidence of impact / measured public value -17 pts 42 here · 59 average
Teacher capability & pedagogy -21 pts 17 here · 37 average
Multi-stakeholder collaboration -26 pts 50 here · 76 average
Equity & inclusion -27 pts 25 here · 52 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Ecuador. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Red de Infocentros Comunitarios – Ecuador's National Rural Community Digital Network · 92
GeoCitizen — Participatory GIS Land-Use Planning for Quito's Ilaló Mountain · 86
Ecuador's WCAG 2.0 AA Web-Accessibility Mandate — a Binding Law With Near-Zero Measured Compliance · 68
SCE's AI Code of Ethics and AI Lab — Ecuador's First Public-Sector AI Governance Framework · 67
SEDIP — Ecuador's Innovatrics ABIS Unifying Passport, Cédula and Social-Service Access · 67
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Cities with evaluated practice
Where the documented practice in Ecuador concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Ushahidi — Kenya's Crowdsourced Crisis-Mapping Platform · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Smart City Wien Framework Strategy · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
ATD-2 to TFDM — NASA's Machine-Learning Airport Scheduler Saves Over a Million Gallons of Jet Fuel · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
Already adopted in 3 other places
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more