evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Ghana Digital Acceleration Project — Accessible-Technology Procurement for Persons with Disabilities

Ghana · Accra · See the Ghana profile · See the Accra profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 55% 72/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Ghana's $200m World Bank-backed Digital Acceleration Project has procured 338 desktop computers, 154 laptops, 220 accessible software packages and Braille displays/encoders for persons with disabilities, the Gender Ministry announced in December 2025.

338
Desktop computers procured (by December 2025)
154
Laptops procured (by December 2025)
220
Accessible software packages procured (by December 2025)
Ghana Digital Acceleration Project — Accessible-Technology Procurement for Persons with Disabilities

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
Ministry of Gender, Children and Social Protection / Ministry of Communications, Digital and Innovation, Ghana (World Bank-financed)
Period
2023–ongoing
Keywords
digital infrastructure, assistive technology procurement, disability inclusion, broadband access

Context

Ghana's Parliament approved a US$200 million World Bank-financed Digital Acceleration Project in 2023 to expand broadband access with an explicit focus on women, rural communities and persons with disabilities, procuring assistive and accessible-computing equipment under the project.

Results

The Minister for Gender, Children and Social Protection announced in December 2025 that 338 desktop computers, 154 laptops, 220 accessible software packages, and Braille displays and encoders had been distributed to persons with disabilities.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
Ministry of Gender, Children and Social Protection procurement staff, Ministry of Communications, Digital and Innovation technical staff

Conditions for success

  • embedding accessible-technology procurement inside a larger national broadband and digital-services investment rather than a standalone side programme

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful