Senegal's CNAO, WHO, UNICEF and ATscale are building a $2.5M national assistive-technology system — training 61 fitting specialists, standing up 7 regional disability committees, and adding AT indicators to the DHIS2 health system — against an 89% unmet need.
89.3 %
Baseline unmet assistive-technology need (baseline, pre-2023)
Regional disability committees established (2023-2026)
3 clinics
Mobile clinics deployed (2023-2026)
1.5 (2025) + 4.3 pledged over 4 years USD million
Additional Senegalese government financing (2025-2029)
Details
Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
Centre National d'Appareillage Orthopédique (CNAO); World Health Organization; UNICEF; ATscale
Period
2023-2027
Keywords
assistive technology, health systems, disability inclusion, digital health information systems
Context
An estimated 7.3% of Senegal's population lives with a disability, and ATscale's baseline assessment found 89.3% of the country's assistive-technology need (wheelchairs, prosthetics, glasses, hearing aids) going unmet. Launched in 2023, 'Bokk Na Ci' ('I am included', in Wolof) is led by Senegal's National Centre for Orthopaedic Appliances (CNAO) with a $2.5 million grant from ATscale (2023-2027) and technical support from WHO and UNICEF.
Objectives
The programme aims to build a national assistive-technology system: training fitting specialists, standing up regional multisectoral disability committees, integrating AT indicators into the national DHIS2 health information system, and deploying mobile clinics for early screening and device fitting.
Activities
The programme has trained 61 professionals (orthopaedic-fitting specialists, technicians and specialised shoemakers), established multisectoral disability committees in seven regions (Kaolack, Kolda, Louga, Saint-Louis, Thies, Tambacounda and Ziguinchor), integrated assistive-technology indicators into DHIS2, and deployed three mobile clinics. Beyond the ATscale grant, the Senegalese government has committed its own financing — $1.5 million to CNAO in 2025 and a further $4.3 million pledged over four years.
Results
Results reported so far are system-building outputs: committees formed, staff trained, first equipment batches distributed, and AT indicators now flowing into DHIS2.
Conclusions
Whether the 89.3% unmet-need baseline has actually fallen has not yet been independently measured or published; the evidence to date documents programme build-out rather than a measured outcome change.
Implementation
Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Commonly funded by
Philanthropic / foundation fundingNational / regional programmes
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Do you run this practice?
Claim it —
verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Data sources
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
A government-convened, multi-stakeholder working group produced Sierra Leone's first national assistive technology policy, strategy and product list, with its network …
Bengaluru-based Thinkerbell Labs built Annie, an audio-guided, self-correcting braille teaching device that lets blind and low-vision students learn independently. Deployed …