evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Glasgow Smart Canal — Sensor-Driven Flood Storage in North Glasgow's Canal (UK)

United Kingdom · Glasgow · See the United Kingdom profile · See the Glasgow profile

Top 89% 27/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Glasgow's £17m Integrated Water Management System uses rainfall forecasts and sensors to lower the Forth & Clyde canal by up to 10 cm ahead of storms, creating 55,000 m³ of storage and unlocking ~110 ha for 3,000+ homes; storm data unpublished.

Glasgow Smart Canal — Sensor-Driven Flood Storage in North Glasgow's Canal (UK)

Details

Promoter
Glasgow City Council / Scottish Canals / Scottish Water
Period
2018-ongoing
Keywords
urban drainage, blue-green infrastructure, flood risk, regeneration

Description

The North Glasgow Integrated Water Management System (NGIWMS), launched in November 2018 by Glasgow City Council, Scottish Canals, Scottish Water and the Metropolitan Glasgow Strategic Drainage Partnership, turns a stretch of the Forth & Clyde / Speirs Wharf canal into a managed stormwater receptor. Sensors and predictive weather forecasting trigger the lowering of canal water levels by as much as 10 cm before heavy rain, creating about 55,000 cubic metres of extra capacity (the partners compare this to 22 Olympic swimming pools) to take surface water from adjacent developments and discharge it to the River Kelvin.
The scheme cost about £17 million, funded through the Glasgow City Region City Deal, the Green Infrastructure Fund and the Scotland's 8th City – Smart City programme. A 60-year service agreement between partners underpins operation. The partners state it unlocks roughly 110 hectares of vacant and derelict land and enables more than 3,000 homes across five sites (Sighthill, Hamiltonhill, Ruchill, Cowlairs, Dundashill), to be connected over 10–15 years; Sighthill was first.
OPPLA's case study contrasts the approach with a conventional grey-drainage alternative it quotes at about £500 million, but this comparison is a partner claim rather than an independent evaluation. Caveats: published figures describe design capacity and development enabled, not measured flood-damage reduction in observed storms; the carbon figure quoted by partners (35,000 t) is unverified; and the benefit depends on forecast accuracy and continued canal operation. It is nonetheless a documented, institutionalised blue-green retrofit with a clear governance model that other canal cities can study.

Read the full analysis: https://glasgowcityregion.co.uk/pioneering-new-digital-surface-water-drainage-system/

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful