evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Glastir — Wales' Whole-Farm Payment Scheme for Peatland, Water and Biodiversity Outcomes

United Kingdom · Cardiff · See the United Kingdom profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 64% 40/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Wales' 2012–2024 whole-farm agri-environment scheme paid farmers over £336m for water, biodiversity and peatland outcomes across roughly 1.3m hectares; independent ERAMMP evaluation found real but limited effects — funding just 11% of Wales' peatland restoration and changing mana

336 £ million
Total payments to farms (2012–2024)
1.3 million hectares
Land under contract (2012–2024)
11 %
Share of Wales peatland restoration funded by Glastir (ERAMMP evaluation period)
9,000 hectares
Total peatland restored across Wales (ERAMMP evaluation period)
31–34 %
Participating farms with management change (ERAMMP evaluation period)

Details

Maturity
Discontinued
Promoter
Welsh Government (Llywodraeth Cymru)
Period
2012–2024
Keywords
agri-environment, peatland restoration, water quality, biodiversity, whole-farm payments

Context

Glastir was the Welsh Government's whole-farm sustainable land management scheme, launched in 2012 and jointly funded by the Welsh Government and the European Union to replace earlier programmes including Tir Gofal and Tir Cynnal. Open to anyone managing agricultural or common land in Wales, it paid participants under five-year management plans for outcomes across several themes — climate, water quality, biodiversity and public access — including a dedicated peatland restoration component.

Activities

Participants entered five-year management plans covering climate, water quality, biodiversity and public access outcomes, including a dedicated peatland restoration component.

Results

By the time the scheme wound down, over £336 million had been paid to Welsh farms since 2012, with roughly 1.3 million hectares under contract. An independent evaluation by ERAMMP (delivered by the UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology) found that Glastir funded only 11% of the roughly 9,000 hectares of peatland restored across Wales over the period, mostly on lower-emission bog types, meaning the climate benefit was smaller than the peatland figures alone suggest. The evaluation also found 'few positive benefits for soil', rising pond degradation, and management change on only 31–34% of participating farms — echoing a 2014 Wales Audit Office review that had already flagged delivery weaknesses.

Conclusions

Glastir remains a widely cited real-world example of both the promise and the limits of whole-farm payment-for-outcomes design: a genuinely large, transparently evaluated programme whose own government-commissioned research shows the gap between funding scale and measured environmental change. An interim scheme bridged 2024 ahead of the new Sustainable Farming Scheme.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Very high (> €5M) — Over £336 million paid to farms 2012–2024, funded jointly by the Welsh Government and the European Union.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Launched 2012, wound down in 2024 with an interim bridging scheme ahead of the new Sustainable Farming Scheme.
Staffing & skills
Welsh Government (Llywodraeth Cymru) — scheme administration, ERAMMP, delivered by the UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology — independent evaluation

Conditions for success

  • Whole-farm, five-year management plans linking payments to multiple outcome themes
  • A dedicated peatland restoration component

Common failure modes

  • ERAMMP found 'few positive benefits for soil', rising pond degradation, and management change on only 31–34% of participating farms
  • Glastir funded only 11% of Wales' total peatland restoration, mostly on lower-emission bog types, so the climate benefit was smaller than headline figures suggest
  • A 2014 Wales Audit Office review had already flagged delivery weaknesses

Where it fits

Governance type
devolved (Welsh) government agri-environment scheme, jointly EU/national funded
Scale
national (Wales-wide), ~1.3 million hectares
Income level
high-income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful