evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Pennsylvania Resource Enhancement and Protection Program (REAP)

United States of America · Harrisburg · See the United States of America profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 64% 40/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Since 2007 Pennsylvania's REAP tax-credit program has paid farmers 50-90% of BMP costs, awarding over $155M in credits across 8,500+ projects on 4,000 farms, keeping a state-reported 6.5M lbs of nitrogen, 350,000 lbs of phosphorus and 350,000 tons of sediment out of waterways.

155 USD million
Tax credits awarded (2007-2024)
8,500+
BMP projects funded (2007-2024)
~4,000
Farms participating (2007-2024)
6.5 million lbs
Nitrogen kept out of waterways (2007-2024)
350,000 lbs
Phosphorus kept out of waterways (2007-2024)
350,000 tons
Sediment kept out of waterways (2007-2024)
13 USD million
New tax credits announced (2024)
Pennsylvania Resource Enhancement and Protection Program (REAP) Pennsylvania Resource Enhancement and Protection Program (REAP)

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Pennsylvania State Conservation Commission (PA Department of Agriculture)
Period
2007–present
Keywords
agri-environment, water quality, tax credit, nutrient management

Context

Pennsylvania's Resource Enhancement and Protection Program (REAP), administered by the State Conservation Commission within the PA Department of Agriculture, has offered state income-tax credits to farmers and landowners since 2007 for adopting best-management practices (BMPs) that cut nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment runoff into Chesapeake Bay tributaries and other Pennsylvania waterways.

Objectives

Reduce agricultural nutrient and sediment pollution in Pennsylvania waterways by incentivising the adoption of BMPs through state tax credits.

Activities

Credits cover 50-90% of BMP costs - no-till and precision agricultural equipment, waste storage facilities, nutrient-management plans, cover crops, stream buffers - up to $250,000 per operation over a seven-year period, and can be applied against PA income tax for up to 15 years from issuance.

Results

As of 2024, REAP has awarded more than $155 million in tax credits for over 8,500 projects on roughly 4,000 farms, with a further $13 million in new credits announced that year. The Commonwealth reports these projects have kept 6.5 million pounds of nitrogen, 350,000 pounds of phosphorus, and 350,000 tons of sediment out of Pennsylvania's streams and rivers since 2007.

Conclusions

REAP is one of the longest-running state-level agricultural payment-for-ecosystem-services/tax-incentive schemes in the United States, though the pollutant-reduction totals are program-modelled estimates reported by the state agency rather than independently audited measurements at each site.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M) — Over $155 million in state income-tax credits awarded since 2007 across 8,500+ BMP projects, covering 50-90% of project costs up to $250,000 per operation over 7 years, plus $13 million in new credits announced in 2024.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Continuously operating state program since 2007 (18 years to 2024/2025), with credits usable against PA income tax for up to 15 years from issuance.
Staffing & skills
State Conservation Commission staff (PA Department of Agriculture), County conservation district verification officers

Conditions for success

  • Legislative authorisation of a dedicated state tax-credit programme
  • Conservation-district verification of BMP installation before credits are issued
  • Sustained multi-year state appropriation of new credits
  • Farmer/landowner adoption of qualifying BMPs (no-till equipment, waste storage, nutrient management plans, cover crops, stream buffers)

Common failure modes

  • Pollutant-reduction totals rely on program modelling rather than independently audited per-site measurement
  • Program depends on continued state tax-credit allocation and could stall if new credits are not funded

Where it fits

Governance type
US state government tax-incentive program
Scale
statewide (Pennsylvania)
Income level
high-income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful