Singapore's LifeSG — Once-Only Life-Event Bundling Cuts Birth Registration From 60 to 15 Minutes
Singapore
GovTech's LifeSG lets new parents register a birth, apply for Baby Bonus and enrol a library membership in one 15-minute …
Sweden · Gothenburg · See the Sweden profile · See the Gothenburg profile
Top 94% 27/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice
In 2020 Gothenburg placed just over 12,000 pupils with an algorithm that measured straight-line rather than walking distance; about 970 families appealed, an internal and an external review followed, and a parent's lawsuit failed.
In spring 2020 the City of Gothenburg placed just over 12,000 children in schools with an algorithm. According to the University of Gothenburg, it was programmed to use straight-line (as-the-crow-flies) distance to school instead of the walking route, which gave many children unreasonably long journeys, for example across the river.
SVT reported that 970 people appealed the 2020 school choice and that 165 pupils were allowed to change school; most requests for change were refused. The primary-education administration commissioned an internal review (reported in June 2020, finding several errors in the school-choice process) and an external review (presented on 18 December 2020, concluding that school choice and placement had not worked as they should). Its director apologised and an action plan was adopted.
Parents, among them researcher Charlotta Kronblad, analysed the placements themselves and concluded that a faulty algorithm without human oversight lay behind them. Kronblad sued the city and lost, according to the University of Gothenburg; the case is widely cited for the difficulty of challenging an algorithmic decision when the affected person cannot inspect the system. The city's current placement rules measure distance along school routes (walking and cycling paths), not in a straight line.
Lesson for public bodies: validate the logic of allocation algorithms against real geography before use, keep human review of outliers, and give those affected a practical route to inspect and contest the method. No measured benefit of the system is reported; this is a cautionary case.
Read the full analysis: https://www.gu.se/nyheter/algoritmer-infor-domstol
Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.
Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
Singapore
GovTech's LifeSG lets new parents register a birth, apply for Baby Bonus and enrol a library membership in one 15-minute …
Russia
Moscow's public health department centrally benchmarks and deploys a marketplace of 50+ vetted computer-vision diagnostic tools as a mandatory "second …
United Kingdom
A Gemini-powered tool converts decades of paper planning records into structured digital data, saving councils an estimated 255 hours a …
Estonia
Estonia's open-source virtual-assistant ecosystem giving citizens a single conversational channel to public services, integrated across 18+ organisations, with human hand-off …
Open full copilot Grounded in cited practices — always check the sources.