evidoria

What works in Sweden

All catalogues

53
evaluated practices
57/100
average quality score
9%
strong evidence, of 47 assessed
7
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Sweden

Drawn from: Sweden's Reserved 'Daddy Months' in Parental Insurance (Pappamånaden 1995–2016) · Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · Sweden's Mandatory Annual Pay Equity Survey (Lönekartläggning) · Empowering Female Entrepreneurship: The 'Women In Business" Magazine in Sweden · Non-Profit Organization "Women in Tech" in Sweden · Swedish Alliance for Women in Sport (SAFWIS) · DIGG's 2022–2024 Monitoring of Digital Public Services — Sweden's DOS-Law Accessibility Oversight · Swedish Lion — Riksarkivet's AI Model Making a Million Handwritten Historical Documents Searchable

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Efficiency +45 pts 89 here · 44 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +19 pts 50 here · 31 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Effectiveness +16 pts 93 here · 77 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +13 pts 89 here · 76 average

Impact on gender equality +9 pts 89 here · 80 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -9 pts 42 here · 50 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 48 average

Evaluation evidence -30 pts 14 here · 45 average

Equity & inclusion -32 pts 20 here · 52 average

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
89 · 44
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
50 · 31
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 50
Effectiveness
93 · 77
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
89 · 76
Impact on gender equality
89 · 80
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Inclusiveness / equity
50 · 42
Sustainability
84 · 78
Evaluated outcomes
89 · 85
Transparency, fairness & accountability
57 · 54
Transferability / replicability
62 · 60
Evidence of learning impact
27 · 28
Achievement / evidence
89 · 91
Evidence of impact / measured results
56 · 59
Documented learning
71 · 74
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 37
Governance, capability & sustainability
60 · 64
Innovation level
57 · 63
Curator validation
68 · 74
Scalability
57 · 64
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
42 · 50
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 48
Evaluation evidence
14 · 45
Equity & inclusion
20 · 52

Coloured bar: Sweden. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Sweden's Reserved 'Daddy Months' in Parental Insurance (Pappamånaden 1995–2016) · 100

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · 100

Sweden's Mandatory Annual Pay Equity Survey (Lönekartläggning) · 96

Empowering Female Entrepreneurship: The 'Women In Business" Magazine in Sweden · 94

Non-Profit Organization "Women in Tech" in Sweden · 93

Swedish Alliance for Women in Sport (SAFWIS) · 89

DIGG's 2022–2024 Monitoring of Digital Public Services — Sweden's DOS-Law Accessibility Oversight · 84

Swedish Lion — Riksarkivet's AI Model Making a Million Handwritten Historical Documents Searchable · 80

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Sweden concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Pikin Tab — Imagine Worldwide's Solar-Powered Tablet Learning Programme in Sierra Leone · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

inABLE Computer Labs for the Blind — An Assistive-Technology Digital-Literacy Pipeline Across Kenya's Specialist Schools · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more