evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Scaling the Oral Exam — UC San Diego's NSF-Funded Project Runs 8,500 Video Oral Exams Across 10 Engineering Courses

United States of America · San Diego · See the United States of America profile · See the San Diego profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 40% 53/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

A three-year, NSF-funded UC San Diego engineering project scaled oral exams to 10 high-enrollment courses, seven professors and 8,500 short video oral exams, training teaching assistants to administer them consistently as an AI-cheating countermeasure.

10
Courses covered
7
Participating professors
~8,500
Oral exams administered
~15 minutes
Typical exam length
Scaling the Oral Exam — UC San Diego's NSF-Funded Project Runs 8,500 Video Oral Exams Across 10 Engineering Courses

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
University of California, San Diego — Jacobs School of Engineering
Period
2023-2026
Keywords
higher education, engineering, assessment, academic integrity

Context

As generative AI made take-home and online assessments unreliable, Huihui Qi, an associate teaching professor in UC San Diego's Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, led an NSF-funded three-year project -- 'Improving the Conceptual Mastery of Engineering Students in High Enrollment Engineering Courses through Oral Exams' -- to test whether short oral exams could be administered at the scale of large lecture courses rather than only in small seminars.

Activities

The project ran across 10 courses with seven participating professors, administering roughly 8,500 short oral exams (about 15 minutes each, mostly conducted over video). Because oral exams are labour-intensive, the team built a two-part teaching-assistant training programme -- video-based asynchronous behavioural training plus course-specific, instructor-led technical training -- so TAs could conduct exams consistently and fairly at scale rather than relying solely on faculty.

Results

UC San Diego Today reported the project's own framing of the results as improving both engineering student performance and motivation, and the work has drawn coverage from the Associated Press, the Wall Street Journal and EdSurge, plus invitations for Qi to run faculty workshops on scaling oral exams at other institutions -- a signal of transferability beyond the original courses.

Conclusions

The publicly available reporting does not include a published effect size, a control-group comparison, or independent replication outside UC San Diego, so the evidence here should be read as a well-documented, at-scale single-institution project rather than a rigorously controlled trial.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — NSF grant funding a three-year project; specific budget not stated.
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years) — Three-year NSF-funded project.
Staffing & skills
Huihui Qi (PI), 7 participating professors, trained teaching assistants

Conditions for success

  • Two-part TA training programme (asynchronous behavioural + instructor-led technical) to allow consistent, fair exams at scale
  • NSF funding enabling a multi-year, multi-course rollout

Common failure modes

  • No published effect size, control-group comparison, or independent replication outside UC San Diego

Where it fits

Governance type
NSF-funded university research project
Scale
single institution (UC San Diego), 10 courses
Income level
high-income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful