evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Hadejia-Nguru Wetlands Typha Control and Basin Trust Fund — Restoring a Shrinking Sahelian Floodplain (Nigeria)

Nigeria · Nguru · See the Nigeria profile

Top 96% 20/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Typha covers ~35,000 of 58,100 ha of Hadejia-Nguru wetlands; trials found cutting 15 cm below water best. Basin governance exists but restoration outcomes remain unquantified.

Hadejia-Nguru Wetlands Typha Control and Basin Trust Fund — Restoring a Shrinking Sahelian Floodplain (Nigeria)

Details

Promoter
Hadejia-Jama'are-Komadugu-Yobe Basin Trust Fund / Joint States IWRM Committee / Ahmadu Bello University
Period
2001-2019
Keywords
wetland restoration, invasive species, Typha, floodplain, Lake Chad basin

Description

The Hadejia-Nguru Wetlands in north-eastern Nigeria are a Ramsar-listed Sahelian floodplain supporting fisheries, farming and dry-season grazing. Upstream dams and irrigation have cut flows; the wetlands are reported to have shrunk by up to two-thirds over 30-40 years, and year-round flows let invasive Typha grass spread rather than die back.
A 2019 study by Ahmadu Bello University researchers found Typha infesting about 35,000 of roughly 58,100 hectares. Field trials compared control methods: cutting 15 cm below the water surface gave the best control (about 95% of overall control effect), black-tarpaulin shading cut proliferation by 54%, and interplanting Phragmites karka by 25%. Fish catches were much lower in Typha-infested areas than in open water.
In parallel, after the 2001 floods linked to the Tiga and Challawa dams, the six riparian states and the federal government set up the Hadejia-Jama'are-Komadugu-Yobe Basin Trust Fund, a catchment management plan, a decision-support system and a rotational water-sharing agreement between upstream and downstream communities.
Caveats: the governance account comes from the committee chair's own 2008 article and presents most actions as just starting; Typha clearing and dredging were pilots, and no measured post-restoration gains in flooding, fish stocks or incomes were found. This is a documented problem and a promising framework, not yet a proven result.

Read the full analysis: https://smujo.id/bw/article/view/9023

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 53

Lake Urmia Restoration Program (ULRP)

Iran

A decade-long Iran–UNDP programme cutting agricultural water use 25% and raising irrigation efficiency ~42% around Ramsar-listed Lake Urmia; independent monitoring …